Find a back issue

Making Dallas Even Better

Mapped: Where Texas Senators John Cornyn and Ted Cruz Spend Their Time on the Road

A couple weeks ago, the Sunlight Foundation did what can only be described as the Lord’s work. It took every U.S. Senate expenditure and transformed it from a worthless PDF to a searchable, sortable spreadsheet. It has everything. Staff retreats, photographer sessions, the salaries of the seven barbers who cut taxpayer-subsidized hair. Everything.

What I was interested in, though, was the travel of Texas’ two U.S. Senators, John Cornyn and Ted Cruz. The spreadsheets break down travel by trip and by stop. I chose not to include Washington, D.C. on these maps, because that was where Cornyn and Cruz were returning to most of the time. (I also didn’t include staff travel, mostly because my eyes may have become permanently crossed staring at all those numbers.) These maps represent travel from January 2013 through April 2014, the most recent data available.

The top map shows both senators’ travels, and the ones below break the travel down by location and frequency. Austin and Houston are Cornyn and Cruz’s most frequent destinations, respectively, but that’s because those are their hometowns.

Some other observations:

– Cornyn visited 27 cities, while Cruz visited 33.

– Jumping off that, Cruz visited more cities outside Texas than he did in the state he represents, 19 to 14. (Not by frequency, of course, but sheer numbers.) There’s a specific cluster in Florida and South Carolina. It’s almost like he’s preparing for some sort of election.

– Ooo boy do San Antonio and Fort Worth get hosed, visit-wise. Now maybe there’s some gray area and the senators scoot down to San Antonio or Fort Worth during a trip marked Austin or Dallas, but I don’t think that’s the case. If these numbers are accurate, it means Cruz visited San Antonio less than he visited New York or Midland, and just as many times as he visited Lubbock. Cornyn also visited four times. Fort Worth was only visited once, by Cornyn. Here are the raw numbers on the rest of the state’s biggest cities:

– Houston: Cruz 58, Cornyn 19
– Dallas: Cruz 20, Cornyn 15
– Austin: Cruz 6, Cornyn 43

[Puts cynic glasses on] This all means one thing: San Antonio has fewer donors.

–  Props to Cornyn for getting out to smaller communities (Falfurrias, Rio Grande City, Smithville, West). I know a lot of those were based on extenuating circumstances, but credit where it’s deserved.

Here are the breakdowns, individually. Drop any additional thoughts in the comments.

Cornyn:

Sen. John Cornyn's travel
Sen. John Cornyn’s travel

Austin 43
Houston 19
Dallas 15
San Antonio 4
Midland 2
Abilene 2
Corpus Christi 2
Laredo 2
Lubbock 1
Wichita Falls 1
El Paso 1
McAllen 1
Carrizo Springs 1
San Angelo 1
Nacogdoches 1
Tyler 1
Waco 1
Conroe 1
Longview 1
Texarkana 1
Fort Worth 1
Falfurrias 1
Rio Grande City 1
West 1
Smithville 1
Odessa 1
(All municipalities are in Texas.)

Cruz:

Sen. Ted Cruz's travels
Sen. Ted Cruz’s travels

Houston 58
Dallas 20
New York, NY 7
Austin 6
Midland 5
San Antonio 4
Lubbock 4
Abilene 3
Corpus Christi 2
Wichita Falls 2
Amarillo 2
Myrtle Beach, SC 2
Los Angeles, CA 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 2
Killeen 2
Philadelphia, PA 2
El Paso 1
McAllen 1
New Orleans, LA 1
Manchester, NH 1
Boston, MA 1
Orlando, FL 1
Columbia, SC 1
Tampa, FL 1
Palm Beach, FL 1
Keene 1
Chicago, IL 1
Hillsdale, MI 1
Detroit, MI 1
Princeton, NJ 1
New Haven, CT 1
Pebble Beach, CA 1

Source: The Sunlight Foundation

  • jdtTX

    Over $13,000,000 in billed technical support?

  • Adam

    You do realize one of our senators is extremely visible and influential beyond just Texas’ borders, yes? Texans elected Ted Cruz to do a job. In order to get that job done as effectively as possible, he has to be in other states, helping other people get on board with the agenda. Spending all one’s time in his own back yard would seem to be wasting the momentum by which he was elected in the first place. Hopefully, there will be plenty of trips to Iowa in the future.

  • rjd

    Were Cruz’s Iowa trips after April 2014? Seems like he’s there every other week.

  • BradfordPearson

    I think the difference (maybe) is that those trips are paid for by a PAC, and not the Senate budget. That’s my guess.

  • Edward

    I thought our senators were elected to represent us, not for some vague, anti-government, me-and-my-dad-go-a-preachin’ walkabout.

  • Brett Moore

    Wait. Texas elected Ted Cruz to run for president?

  • Dubious Brother

    Senator Cruz was elected from Texas because his ideology is dramatically different from the Washington DC norm. He does need to help encourage others in this country who think as he does.

    For an interesting comparison, I would like to see this same study done for Senators Clinton and Obama for the same time period in 2005 and 2006. Did they even go to their “home” states?

  • Native Texan

    We will put a Canadian in the Oval office or secede.

  • Eric Celeste

    This is my favorite comment of the month.

  • Edward

    Thank you.

  • Edward

    I think his ideology is EXACTLY the norm in DC: self-centered, self-congratulatory, and totally focused on what’s best for Cruz. His grandstanding hasn’t accomplished anything positive for our country, and it has become crystal clear the more people get to know him the less they like him.
    Cruz doesn’t “stand” for anything except Cruz.

  • Just me

    Did they golf enough?

  • Dubious Brother

    I couldn’t disagree with you more if you are talking about Cruz but you do give a good description of both Obama and Clinton.

  • Edward

    Both Obama and Clinton have accomplished a lot – some good, some not that good. The fact that millions more Americans can now get health insurance is a huge accomplishment. It’s sad that Texas is leaving billions on the table as our money gets sent to other states that were smart enough (even Arkansas!) to find a way to help their citizens.

    I would like to hear something that Cruz has accomplished, other than fundraising off of various “stands” that he has taken that seem to quietly fade away once the cameras move on to something else.