Will Twitter Kill FrontBurner?

Careful, long-suffering readers of FrontBurner have probably noticed a subtle shift here in recent weeks. As Twitter has come into its own, we’ve all fired up our accounts and gotten to twittering. Because, you know, everyone else is doing it, so it must be cool. Some of the material we heretofore would have put on FrontBurner is now winding up on Twitter.

On opening day, for instance, I twittered like a madman from my seat at the ballpark. A year ago, I would have subjected FrontBurner to all my trenchant baseball analysis and artful iPhone photography. But Twitter just seems a medium better-suited to such “Hey, here’s something real quick” communication. Its iPhone interface (Tweetie) is certainly easier to navigate than the one we use to post on FrontBurner (WordPress).

FrontBurner has always been a mix of the high (arguments about the Trinity project) and low (shirtless pics of Eric). To my mind, that’s been part of its charm. If the latter largely migrates to our Twitter feeds, will FrontBurner suffer? Or will the change actually improve it? More important, how the heck are we gonna make money doing any of this?

81 comments

  1. Boo.

    @ 12:53 pm on April 13, 2009
  2. I check out the FrontBurner a few times a day. I still do not even know what Twitter is or what it does. I feel old.

    @ 12:56 pm on April 13, 2009
  3. You’re one “gee,” two “darn’s” and a single “whatchmathingerbob” away from Steve Blow territory.

    submitted via twitterfeed follow #treygarrison

    @ 12:56 pm on April 13, 2009
  4. I will not pay any attention to the Twitter posts. But I do regularly read Frontburner, which also drives traffic to your other blogs. If Frontburner becomes irrelevant, your other blogs will as well (at least as far as I am concerned).

    @ 12:58 pm on April 13, 2009
  5. I don’t like Twitter. It’s a fad. Basically, Tim, you’re killing the blog (which is like a fine pair of loafers) for the digital equivalent of crocs.

    @ 12:58 pm on April 13, 2009
  6. Really not interested in Twitter.

    Keep putting quality posts on Frontburner, and its traffic will keep growing.

    @ 12:59 pm on April 13, 2009
  7. @ Trey: To be clear, man, I wasn’t marveling at all the kids who Twitter. I was puzzling through how a new medium will affect the one you’re reading right now.

    Also, if Steve Blow starts twittering, I will follow that so hard that he’ll feel it. (What?)

    @ 1:00 pm on April 13, 2009
  8. Don’t do it. Don’t divert good content to Twitter. Not good for your advertisers or for your loyal fans. This means you too, SideDish.

    @ 1:00 pm on April 13, 2009
  9. I agree with all the posts above – except Trey’s.

    @ 1:00 pm on April 13, 2009
  10. I am not a fan of twitter. I keep Frontburner always on my computer and its just easier to hit refresh.

    @ 1:04 pm on April 13, 2009
  11. I like twitter for things like telling people I just smacked the hell out of my knee on my desk, and may die.

    I like Frontburner for getting yelled at.

    @ 1:07 pm on April 13, 2009
  12. I just don’t feel it necessary to use a service that has “twit” as the root of its name.

    @ 1:15 pm on April 13, 2009
  13. @ 1:16 pm on April 13, 2009
  14. eff twitter. i agree w/ all above. please dont kill frontburner.

    @ 1:17 pm on April 13, 2009
  15. I heart Bethany

    @ 1:17 pm on April 13, 2009
  16. Not at all a fan of Twitter nor am I a fan of Facebook.

    I do not need to know, much less care, about the goings on of people every five seconds.

    No one’s life is THAT interesting. Period.

    Before Halloween, Twitter will be passé and something else will dominate. It has that flavor of the moment about it.

    @ 1:17 pm on April 13, 2009
  17. While I check FB several times a day (and therby add to the page views from which D generates revenue), I will never subscribe to Twitter and D will never make money from Twitter. I hope Twitter dies.

    @ 1:18 pm on April 13, 2009
  18. “I don’t like (Choose from below*) It’s a fad.”

    *Blogging, Facebook, MySpace,

    That said, Tim, since you’re running Wordpress on this blog, why not just install a plugin to pull the twitter feeds of all your contributing writers into Frontburner on the right rail. All that’s needed is to set up an RSS feed that searches your tweets and add a #FB hashtag to your posts?

    Problem solved. You’re welcome. You guys make it so difficult.

    @ 1:21 pm on April 13, 2009
  19. Tim, don’t let any of these fossils make you doubt yourself, dude. Blogs are so 2008. They even sound lame. Blog. Blah. Twitter and other immediately interactive microcommunication is the digital future. Kudos to you for being ahead of the curve. Really, you CAN fly. Close your eyes, stretch your arms out, shuffle a little bit closer to the edge, now lean forward and believe!

    Seriously, I think its great Wick still trusts so much to someone who can’t tell the difference. To any of you reading this who might have recently been laid off, don’t let anyone tell you “things have changed”. Your big, fat runny piece of the American pie is still waiting. You just need to find out who has it and take it away from them.

    @ 1:21 pm on April 13, 2009
  20. Easy solution — integrate Twitter feed into Frontburner.

    @ 1:26 pm on April 13, 2009
  21. @ Chip: Thank you for demonstrating the REAL danger to FrontBurner. I’m sorry if you or someone you know was laid off. But please don’t infect us with your anger.

    @ 1:29 pm on April 13, 2009
  22. @Grant
    Why haven’t you done that on my blog?

    [scowls]

    @ 1:30 pm on April 13, 2009
  23. I agree with Drew. I am done. I do not need a blitzkrieg of information. I ignore all invitations to social network. If I have to look at someone’s baby photos, they should at least buy me lunch. And I have no intention of ever signing up on Twitter, even if it does mean I sacrifice updates on Tim’s bladder function.

    @ 1:30 pm on April 13, 2009
  24. @Trey Garrison

    Because you haven’t posed the problem to me. I’ll do it this afternoon, right after I tweet the figure skating pics of you from this weekend.

    @ 1:32 pm on April 13, 2009
  25. @ Barbara: I’m typing this with one hand.

    (No? Too much? Over the line?)

    @ 1:32 pm on April 13, 2009
  26. Chip, I’m-a go out on a limb here and posit that resistance to embracing new technologies is one of the big reasons newspapers have been suffering since long before the recent economic downturn, yes? Hmm?

    @ 1:32 pm on April 13, 2009
  27. I can’t access Twitter (or Facebook, or Myspace, or YouTube, or…) from the office, so if you go all Twitter-happy, you will lose me and I will be sad.

    Twitter=CueCat…i.e., sounded like a good idea at the time, but both will eventually end up as the punchline of a second-rate Vegas comedian someday. IJS.

    @ 1:33 pm on April 13, 2009
  28. With no anger or hostility…that makes me sad, I will/would continue to check here daily. I won’t twitter – makes my head hurt to think about it. And yes I feel old too.

    @ 1:33 pm on April 13, 2009
  29. @Grant
    That’s what Brian Boitano’d do, if he was here right now.
    He’d make a plan and he’d follow through;
    That’s what Brian Boitano’d do.

    @ 1:34 pm on April 13, 2009
  30. @Tim

    “how the heck are we gonna make money doing any of this?”

    It’s simple. You’ve created a virtual community. Now create events to bring those of like mind (or those who agree with whatever post(s) you’re trumpeting) together in the real world (ie. foster your community). You’ll find these people tend to like the same things. Bring forth products, vendors, or create businesses which support this community.

    Look at Fox News. They’ve created and marketed the “Tea Party” as an extension of their brand. Even though I think it’s moronic, I’m intelligent enough to realize there’s a way to monopolize on bringing a bunch of people together that believe the same thing. I mean think about it…If you head to the party with a truck load of “Don’t Tread on Me” flag, “Rush is Right” mugs, and “Fox News Honey Roasted Peanuts”, you’re going to make a killing. Plus you’ve just gathered all of the advertisers for whatever market your gathering in one place. They’ll love you for it.

    @ 1:36 pm on April 13, 2009
  31. Oh. If you are adding photos to the commentary, perhaps I should reconsider. (If lines are to be crossed, I may as well leap. My apologies to Mrs. Tim)

    @ 1:38 pm on April 13, 2009
  32. sorry but I don’t follow twitter. I subscribe to FB via a RSS feed and check the feed every few hours.

    the only use I see for twitter is to let us know when the Norks send a missile our way, then we can duck and cover

    @ 1:39 pm on April 13, 2009
  33. Twitter = pet rock

    @Tim
    Are you saying non-sequitors are the danger or criticism of posters are the danger?

    @ 1:39 pm on April 13, 2009
  34. The DMN Twitters. I suppose if everyone who is consistently out of touch with the world gets a cuecat, you’ll want one, too.

    @ 1:40 pm on April 13, 2009
  35. “Look at Fox News. They’ve created and marketed the “Tea Party” as an extension of their brand. ”

    sorry Jason but Fox News didn’t create the “Tea Parties” they have just decided to follow them unlike the rest of the media

    @ 1:44 pm on April 13, 2009
  36. Don’t get Uncle Barky started on Twitter.

    @ 1:44 pm on April 13, 2009
  37. I’ve tried Twitter. It’s too much mindless noise that I don’t need, nor do my friends need. My eyeballs are drying up and my brains are constipated from sifting through all the digital information choices. How’s a fly to decide which pile to lay maggots in?

    But I am so glad that I am not alone with my opinions and this post did not end up on Twitter.

    @ 1:47 pm on April 13, 2009
  38. I dunno, I mean, it’s kind of fun to sit there and twitter the hell out of something, you know?

    @ 1:48 pm on April 13, 2009
  39. update frontburner’s twitter page more often. thatway people can follow fb with rss feeds.

    @ 1:50 pm on April 13, 2009
  40. @peterk

    “they have just decided to follow them unlike the rest of the media”

    I would believe they were only “covering” the events if Glen Beck hadn’t said the following:

    “…you can “celebrate with Fox News” at any of four “FNC Tax Day Tea Parties”

    See for yourself (it’s at the 16 second mark): http://mediamatters.org/countyfair/200904060023?show=1

    So we’re getting into semantics here. In the end, it’s an awesome marketing opportunity. Happy tea-bagging!

    Covering

    @ 1:51 pm on April 13, 2009
  41. @ Bethany…I don’t like twitter, period, but instead of FB? No, way. Sometimes we need room to move about.

    I’m also annoyed by the abbreviations. Our language is already watered down enough, let’s have some words bouncing back and forth.

    @ 1:58 pm on April 13, 2009
  42. Gadfly, your obvious anger (if you’re not angry, my point won’t work, so I have to say you are) is the REAL threat to FrontBurner and your Luddite view of embracing new technologies killed newspapers.

    Personally, I’m going to follow Bethany’s lead and make fun of Twitter, then be sort of for it so that whichever way the majority opinion moves I’m covered.

    @ 2:00 pm on April 13, 2009
  43. When did we work the teabagging into the conversation?

    so lost…

    @ 2:01 pm on April 13, 2009
  44. Chip: Never give a direct and precise answer when a vague one will do.

    @ 2:03 pm on April 13, 2009
  45. I don’t do twitter.

    @ 2:07 pm on April 13, 2009
  46. why has twitter blown up in recent months? It’s been around for 2 effing yrs.

    Anyone heard of Facebook? I think it’s going to be big.

    @ 2:10 pm on April 13, 2009
  47. Twitter, Facebook, whatever. I don’t want any of it. I can’t even keep my own blog up to date; why would I want to have a Facebook page?

    @ 2:11 pm on April 13, 2009
  48. Twitter is a mixed bag. I think to call it irrelevant and next year’s punchline is a bit too far. Everyone assumes that Twitter is just a place to describe every 5 minutes of your life — which it can be, if you want — but the real power of Twitter is that it has a chance to be what email marketing could have been, if it wasn’t overridden by spam and unwieldy content ordered into it by marketing managers that struggle to understand the medium.

    If that’s been your experience of Twitter — then I suggest not following the people you’re following, even if they’re your friend in real life. Use Facebook for that. There are people and organizations that use Twitter to communicate small, relevant messages at properly timed intervals; they’re the ones creating a great buzz for Twitter and that will make it relevant more than a year into the future.

    (Next up… looking at Twitter in the aggregate. Another wonderful use…)

    @ 2:11 pm on April 13, 2009
  49. I don’t Twitter. I have more of a life than listening to my cell phone “tweet” every 2 seconds.

    @ 2:14 pm on April 13, 2009
  50. @Bethany

    Sorry about that. peterk and his friends are going to teabag city hall in a few days. I think he felt I was minimizing their plans. I was actually congratulating them on the enormity of that effort.

    Even as a bleeding heart liberal, I’m more than happy to see the mayor get teabagged.

    @ 2:15 pm on April 13, 2009
  51. Jason: If you horizontally flip this photo, you can see what that kind of looks like.

    http://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/06/everyone-have-their-blowup-dol.html

    @ 2:22 pm on April 13, 2009
  52. I like the small bird on the company’s Website. I couldn’t really figure out anything beyond that.

    @ 2:26 pm on April 13, 2009
  53. Tim as a fan and professor of new media I think you are comparing apples with orang-utans. You can use one to feed the other, not replace.

    @ 2:36 pm on April 13, 2009
  54. Bethany, I agree entirely, more or less. New technologies can be a two-edged sword, cutting both ways, this year’s Twitter could be next year’s CueCat, so it’s important to stand firmly behind someone enthusiastic about one. Say, ten to fifteen feet.

    @ 2:36 pm on April 13, 2009
  55. To answer your question…

    You won’t.

    A former DMNer.

    @ 2:37 pm on April 13, 2009
  56. Tim, not feeling Twitter.

    Frontburner is the best thing since sliced bread, really.

    I’ve noticed it has not been as interesting lately and couldn’t figure out why. If you guys continue to twit or tweet or whatever you call it, I’ll just move on. Thanks in advance for the memories.

    @ 2:38 pm on April 13, 2009
  57. Tim, you asked “how the heck are we gonna make money doing any of this?”

    As I said in our daily staff meeting today, I am willing to pay for you kids to be on the Twitter for as long as it takes to be profitable. You told me you and the boys need $1,500 a month to pay for the Twitter, is that still enough?

    @ 2:42 pm on April 13, 2009
  58. @Trey:

    They’ll cut your **** in half,
    And serve it to a pig.
    And though it hurts you’ll laugh,
    And dance a ****less jig.

    And that’s the way it goes,
    and though you’re **** upon,
    though you die, La Resistance lives on.

    @ 2:54 pm on April 13, 2009
  59. Sigh.

    I signed up for a Twitter feed, or account or whatever to follow one of my favorite bloggers (Hi Bethany!). The next day in my mailbox were like 20 emails, all discussing different points of conversation. I guess I did something wrong, or didn’t check a correct box, or something.

    So then on opening game day, I was going to comment on your twitter feeds (something like “Say Hi to Kevin Sherrington from Amy”), but then I found out I needed a sign in and password, which I had done before, but had not written down or saved.

    Sigh. Like D above, I feel old.

    @ 2:59 pm on April 13, 2009
  60. I prefer fluttering to twittering. IJS

    @ 3:04 pm on April 13, 2009
  61. Chip, I had no anger in me when I wrote my comment. Absolutely zilch. I was making a funny about my posting name. Obviously I am not a good writer like others on FB, but I am good with visuals. So if I were truly upset, I could create something like this:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/35405318@N06/3438609925/

    @ 3:13 pm on April 13, 2009
  62. Twitter has nothing to do with embracing new technologies. It uses TCPIP and the Internet, for heaven’s sake! Twitter is a way of embracing your own thought processes that are incapable of generating anything intelligent to say (or read) beyond 140 characters.

    Or 255 if you are really “smart-stupid.”

    @ 3:24 pm on April 13, 2009
  63. Twitter reminds me of Frontburner, actually. For the current events, enertainment and career-related blogs that I read, I use an RSS reader. But Frontburner doesn’t really work in that format. FB is good for checking in a couple times a day and finding a few new inane, amusing posts. It is Twitter, damnit, only with Twitter you assemble your own D magazine staff.

    @ 3:30 pm on April 13, 2009
  64. Bethany, just because you banged your knee doesn’t mean people won’t yell at you. They’ll yell that you’re stupid. They’ll yell that you’re clumsy. They’ll yell, You’re going to turn out just like your father, Danny, a shiftless red-nosed drunk! So it’s not like they’re mutually exclusive.

    Twitter = bubblegum for teenyboppers and a few desperately trendy adults. I’d say it’s beneath your dignity, Tim, but we both know I’m a terrible liar.

    @ 3:33 pm on April 13, 2009
  65. I don’t know, Bill. I mean, being able to edit yourself down to 140 characters is (if you’re not resorting to text speak) a feat and marvel of copy editing abilities.

    @ 3:36 pm on April 13, 2009
  66. Way best comment string ever on FB Nation. Way.

    I’m with Wick,nice logo – for 1968.

    @ 3:36 pm on April 13, 2009
  67. Jason:

    Selling t-shirts and coffee mugs at a Tweet meet does not pay for network journalism. It wouldn’t keep a single TV station or a single magazine like D in breakfast muffins — if the staff numbers were anything more than, say, the high single figures.

    Trey:

    Typically, your technology-killed-the-newspaper-dinosaurs is a pretty simple-minded, techno-party line on what’s happened. Even two years ago, when the cutbacks started, newspapers were still making the kinds of profit margins that Exxon would kill for. The technology didn’t hurt them; the evaporation of classified advertising did. So, wise-ass one, how do you get classified advertisers to pay you on your internet site when they can use craigslist or monster.com for free?

    Newspapers may have been slow to respond to new technology, but blindly following or anticipating new gizmo trends was never the solution. CueCat, anyone? And oh yes, YouTube is on track to lose half a billion dollars this year.

    @ 3:47 pm on April 13, 2009
  68. Develop a special code and use Twitter as the communications locus for a mid-scale narcotics distribution network or a high-end call girl service.

    That’d make money. I joss keeding. I’m innocent!

    @ 3:52 pm on April 13, 2009
  69. @ Gadfly:

    I know you weren’t angry. I was just being gratuitously sardonic while riffing off of your illustrative comment to make contrasting fun of two others you also read, comments which unlike yours actually contained the specific language I was poking fun at. That’s sort of how you can tell I wasn’t seriously criticizing you. But I do apologize for only using you.

    It was awfully thoughtful of you, though, to make a special graphic just for the occasion, particularly one especially engraved with each of our names. What is the item the fly is supposed to be feeding on?

    Don’t make more of this than it is, but has anyone else told you you’re quite handsome for a fly? You are.

    @ 4:08 pm on April 13, 2009
  70. integrate don’t hate…..tell your IT types you want to use this…and the twitter feeds will show up in a side bar on the side of the blog. That way you have the best of both….long form for those things that require wordy explanations. and short form for when you want to make 140 character funnies.

    http://www.velvet.id.au/twitter-wordpress-sidebar-widget/

    @ 4:14 pm on April 13, 2009
  71. Chip, cool. Anyway, this is the first time I’ve ever been called “handsome”. I’m a she, and I will be changing my name soon to smallrooms when my website is up and running. “Gadfly” is an ugly, masculine kind-of name.

    @ 4:33 pm on April 13, 2009
  72. The best new technology on FB was opening up the blog comments. There are no limits to the number of characters who comment here.

    @ 4:34 pm on April 13, 2009
  73. I love Twitter! I put it on my blog to keep those who follow it from complaining that I don’t update my blog enough. So now they get a few choice thoughts and occurences, and an “extended” version every few days. Best of both worlds!

    @ 4:47 pm on April 13, 2009
  74. What mkw1342 and elbow said. Blog with a side of tweet.

    @ 4:58 pm on April 13, 2009
  75. Read something on Tim’s Facebook post where Zac had replied with a post and linked to his Twitter where I found Eric had a twitpic which had an emoticon of this guy’s Friendfeed blog and somehow… I ended up back here. :-/

    @ 5:08 pm on April 13, 2009
  76. And another thing, Twitter rhymes with shi*ter and FrontBurner doesn’t rhyme with anything.

    @ 5:27 pm on April 13, 2009
  77. St Benedictine… thank you. Classified was where the money was, and now classified is gone. And will never come back.

    @ 5:59 pm on April 13, 2009
  78. If you only used Twitter, you’d have missed Bethany’s fabulous comment about tea bags.

    Nuff said?

    @ 8:31 pm on April 13, 2009
  79. If you only used Twitter, you’d have missed the whole Sandra Crenshaw post at the elections – well maybe it would have been shorter and even harder to decipher.

    @ 9:04 pm on April 13, 2009
  80. Frankly, I don’t have the time to keep track of activity on Twitter. I do, however, have time to check Frontburner once a day.

    @ 12:51 pm on April 14, 2009
  81. If you only used Twitter, you’d have missed everything that RayRayRay has said.

    On second thought. F Frontburner.

    @ 2:26 pm on April 14, 2009