Comments on: Ron Kirk Is Not Royce West

By: B Rex

B Rex — Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:58:21 +0000

Didn’t Kirk leave the city of Dallas broke?

By: The Other Marty Cortland

The Other Marty Cortland — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:57:53 +0000

The most telling difference between Royce West and Ron Kirk is that Kirk is a lot cheaper to retain as your counsel.

By: It is okay to go outside now.

It is okay to go outside now. — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:08:53 +0000

It is sad that alcoholism is not a treatable disease.

By: dallasnewsgirl

dallasnewsgirl — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:16:41 +0000

Kirk was definately at Gilley’s. Interviewed him at the top of the 9p.

By: Michael in LH

Michael in LH — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:21:20 +0000

Murphry’s law strikes again.

http://home.pacific.net.au/~bangsund/muphry.htm

By: jamesn

jamesn — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:57:55 +0000

Boy, Howdy. That’s some reporting. Just about anyone sober enough to see their TV knew Kirk wasn’t in Chicago…

You Betcha.

By: JimS

JimS — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:17:32 +0000

Over the next four years, D Magazine will get better at making these distinctions.

By: JB

JB — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:03:06 +0000

@ Andy
I indeed asked that question. It just couldn’t be resisted under such circumstances.

By: Warhol Reject

Warhol Reject — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:00:06 +0000

Bottom line is it seems everyone was too drunk/euphoric (including Ron Kirk himself, clone, hologram, or otherwise) to know where they were who who was there with them...

By: Andy Kaufman

Andy Kaufman — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:59:31 +0000

I suppose that a joke in the nature of a general similarity of appearances would be (i) inappropriate and/or (ii) not funny?