Comments on: Re: An Open Letter to Talmadge Heflin

By: Johann

Johann — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:13:50 +0000

It’s an opinion piece. Some people must interpret that to mean they can make up their own facts so they can maintain their opinions with minimal cognitive dissonance.

By: John B

John B — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:35:04 +0000

Tamalefudge Hellfin.

By: Snotty-tot

Snotty-tot — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:17:59 +0000

Amy S. is indefatigable and I heart her.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:08:40 +0000

Amy, let’s start a column for the DMN called, “Nuh-uhhhh.”

By: Daniel

Daniel — Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:42:46 +0000

How dare anybody spend money on below-median-income-household kids. It’s harrumph an outrage! That money could have be spent bankrupting future generations so that Little George might feel properly empenised! Instead, if we twist the semantics just so, it would appear our tax dollars feed brown children meat. Where I come from, that’s called socialism.

Thus spake Sir Topham Hat.

By: Amy S

Amy S — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:18:26 +0000

I’m done writing for free for the DMN, they need to pay a REAL writer (not a blogger mom who frequently uses “I” and too many commas). They pay to write the negative stuff (and Kent is a good writer), but rely on amateurs to fill in the rest (can you say NeighborsGo?).

Besides I’ve written opinion pieces for them and they’ve edited the good stuff out. No Fun At All.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:39:42 +0000

Amy, you should write a rebuttal.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:39:12 +0000

Again – 15 people on the Opinions staff, and they can’t fact check or even write a correct correction?

By: Amy S

Amy S — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 15:14:54 +0000

1 inch, lower right corner of the editorial page – it only corrects the district’s publishing of its financial information. Does not call into question any of the other “factual” (hahahahahaha) information thsy they did not take the time to fact check.