Comments on: Re: Wick Cannot Be Stopped. Nor, It Appears, Even Contained.

By: adkim

adkim — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:38:39 +0000

Hey, Tim. Look at your post below. “It it you?”

hmph.

By: lee

lee — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:55:26 +0000

I guess if Wick is not a true conservative, then George Will is not either. His current column ends as follows:

“It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?”

By: Ms. Grammar

Ms. Grammar — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:39:54 +0000

Bethany, it is not polite to point.
KRM: Have you got a sleep deficit, dear?
Rawlins: Take a deep breath and try again.

By: amanda

amanda — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:11:26 +0000

That’s a great sentence, for the dallasnews blogs…

By: Rawlins Gilliland

Rawlins Gilliland — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 01:02:04 +0000

So Wick’s credentials as a ‘conservative’ are bogus? Breathless news (’from a northern state’) by a hit-the-streets gumshoe with insider info that eluded Wm. F. Buckley and the National Review. I’m thinking Pulitzer!

By: KRM

KRM — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:30:03 +0000

go eat a potatoe

By: the long-time teacher

the long-time teacher — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:12:21 +0000

Another conservative who can’t spell. . . it’s “please.”

By: KRM

KRM — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:10:32 +0000

The patronizing grammar police, puhhhleaze. You’re on a blog, not writing for The National Review.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:55:12 +0000

I was trying to be good and not point at it.