From Sg. Poyzer, in the comments section to that below post:
As the former vice chair of a county Conservative Party in a northern state, Wick is not now nor has ever been a real Conservative. If he was or had been it would understand the socialist nature of Obama’s economic platform.
Wick, I had no idea that you were a vice chair of a county Conservative Party in a northern state. (Yes. That’s right. I brought the discussion down to a matter of grammar.)
I was trying to be good and not point at it.
The patronizing grammar police, puhhhleaze. You’re on a blog, not writing for The National Review.
Another conservative who can’t spell. . . it’s “please.”
go eat a potatoe
So Wick’s credentials as a ‘conservative’ are bogus? Breathless news (’from a northern state’) by a hit-the-streets gumshoe with insider info that eluded Wm. F. Buckley and the National Review. I’m thinking Pulitzer!
That’s a great sentence, for the dallasnews blogs…
Bethany, it is not polite to point.
KRM: Have you got a sleep deficit, dear?
Rawlins: Take a deep breath and try again.
I guess if Wick is not a true conservative, then George Will is not either. His current column ends as follows:
“It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?”
Hey, Tim. Look at your post below. “It it you?”
hmph.