<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Edwards Admits Affair, Dallas Retiree Rejoices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/</link>
	<description>FrontBurner® has been called the best blog in Dallas (repeatedly), a snarky celebration of ignorance, and a daily conversation about Dallas among the editors of D Magazine.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:45:16 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39798</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39798</guid>
		<description>This affects anything how?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This affects anything how?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39793</link>
		<dc:creator>julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39793</guid>
		<description>Of course Edward&#039;s actions (having an affair) are indefensible.  

As were Newt Gringrich&#039;s when he did essentially the same thing...had an affair while married to a wife with cancer.  Newt managed to top Edwards by asking for a divorce from his wife while she lay ill in the hospital. 

I for one am sick and tired of these guys who can&#039;t keep their pants zipped up, no matter what party they are from. It&#039;s disgusting, juvenile, and shows a disturbing lack of self-control and good judgement. 

I&#039;m shocked by Edward&#039;s actions, and his weak &quot;explanation/apology&quot; that was televised. I wish political wives would start dumping these guys on the spot.  

That being said....he&#039;s not running for anything. Let&#039;s try to stick to what&#039;s important: the fact that after 6 years of total Republican rule, the country is crumbling around our ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course Edward&#8217;s actions (having an affair) are indefensible.  </p>
<p>As were Newt Gringrich&#8217;s when he did essentially the same thing&#8230;had an affair while married to a wife with cancer.  Newt managed to top Edwards by asking for a divorce from his wife while she lay ill in the hospital. </p>
<p>I for one am sick and tired of these guys who can&#8217;t keep their pants zipped up, no matter what party they are from. It&#8217;s disgusting, juvenile, and shows a disturbing lack of self-control and good judgement. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked by Edward&#8217;s actions, and his weak &#8220;explanation/apology&#8221; that was televised. I wish political wives would start dumping these guys on the spot.  </p>
<p>That being said&#8230;.he&#8217;s not running for anything. Let&#8217;s try to stick to what&#8217;s important: the fact that after 6 years of total Republican rule, the country is crumbling around our ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Enuff</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39781</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Enuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39781</guid>
		<description>I read it.  I didn&#039;t read it as a joke. TL asked you a simple question 3 times and yo never answered it.  You gave one attack after another and while making the accusation that TL was doing the attack.  
Look, it is very clear to anyone that knows the system here.  Amanda is not upset at Fred Baron for trying to help John Edwards out of this unforgiveable mess by giving him a few thousand bucks, THEY are upset with Fred for giving hundreds of thousands to the Democratic party and liberal causes. They trash him, not for being a lawyer, but for being a lawyer for the poor and the sick.  They know members of their own party have done far worse than John Edwards and they are still in office or appearing of the fair and balanced Fox News.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read it.  I didn&#8217;t read it as a joke. TL asked you a simple question 3 times and yo never answered it.  You gave one attack after another and while making the accusation that TL was doing the attack.<br />
Look, it is very clear to anyone that knows the system here.  Amanda is not upset at Fred Baron for trying to help John Edwards out of this unforgiveable mess by giving him a few thousand bucks, THEY are upset with Fred for giving hundreds of thousands to the Democratic party and liberal causes. They trash him, not for being a lawyer, but for being a lawyer for the poor and the sick.  They know members of their own party have done far worse than John Edwards and they are still in office or appearing of the fair and balanced Fox News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39772</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39772</guid>
		<description>Really, this is all too predictable. The thread even more so than the story.

Sexual infidelity was quite the scandal when Thomas Hardy was writing his infuriatingly tepid &quot;masterpieces.&quot; Today, it&#039;s fodder for feigned outrage during an election season. Surprise surprise!

Face it, Vitter and Foley were funnier beacause they were bona fide deviants -- not necessarily because they were family-values Republicans, although I won&#039;t pretend I didn&#039;t relish that irony. Like lip-licking, rubbing-my-palms-together-in-glee relish. That&#039;s my right as an American, God dammit. 

Garden-variety infidelity, on the other hand, is barely entertaining enough to sustain a locally-produced half-hour reality show. If Edwards had had a three-way with an 84-year-old woman and a donkey -- or more deliciously yet, an elephant -- then, &lt;i&gt;then&lt;/i&gt; we&#039;d have a story here.

But Edwards is no JFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, this is all too predictable. The thread even more so than the story.</p>
<p>Sexual infidelity was quite the scandal when Thomas Hardy was writing his infuriatingly tepid &#8220;masterpieces.&#8221; Today, it&#8217;s fodder for feigned outrage during an election season. Surprise surprise!</p>
<p>Face it, Vitter and Foley were funnier beacause they were bona fide deviants &#8212; not necessarily because they were family-values Republicans, although I won&#8217;t pretend I didn&#8217;t relish that irony. Like lip-licking, rubbing-my-palms-together-in-glee relish. That&#8217;s my right as an American, God dammit. </p>
<p>Garden-variety infidelity, on the other hand, is barely entertaining enough to sustain a locally-produced half-hour reality show. If Edwards had had a three-way with an 84-year-old woman and a donkey &#8212; or more deliciously yet, an elephant &#8212; then, <i>then</i> we&#8217;d have a story here.</p>
<p>But Edwards is no JFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39771</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39771</guid>
		<description>indefensable?  word?  line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>indefensable?  word?  line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amanda</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39770</link>
		<dc:creator>amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39770</guid>
		<description>Julie and TL, it was a joke.  Not a tit for tat, as I said.  Later as I also said, I dropped all attempts at humor.  You can&#039;t joke on an level, ever, when you have to defend the undefensable.  

And still, the defenders of Edwards refuse to refute his actions...more diversions.  There is every other possible political issue, person, and issue mentioned EXCEPT Edwards.  That speaks volumes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie and TL, it was a joke.  Not a tit for tat, as I said.  Later as I also said, I dropped all attempts at humor.  You can&#8217;t joke on an level, ever, when you have to defend the undefensable.  </p>
<p>And still, the defenders of Edwards refuse to refute his actions&#8230;more diversions.  There is every other possible political issue, person, and issue mentioned EXCEPT Edwards.  That speaks volumes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39768</link>
		<dc:creator>julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39768</guid>
		<description>On Aug 9 at 4:10pm, Amanda&#039;s last sentence in her post is:

&quot;I can politely disagree with someone, and yet, not attack them.&quot;

But just a few sentences earlier, in the VERY same post, her first sentence:

&quot;TL…you may need to be medicated. Or, take a remedial punctuation course? Or both…&quot;

Maybe it&#039;s Amanda that needs the meds, if she can&#039;t remember what she wrote seconds before...

Thumberlina, you go girl.  I enjoy your posts. Don&#039;t let the crazies beat you down...their day is over, and they know it. The American citizens just woke up from a long nightmare, and they know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Aug 9 at 4:10pm, Amanda&#8217;s last sentence in her post is:</p>
<p>&#8220;I can politely disagree with someone, and yet, not attack them.&#8221;</p>
<p>But just a few sentences earlier, in the VERY same post, her first sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;TL…you may need to be medicated. Or, take a remedial punctuation course? Or both…&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s Amanda that needs the meds, if she can&#8217;t remember what she wrote seconds before&#8230;</p>
<p>Thumberlina, you go girl.  I enjoy your posts. Don&#8217;t let the crazies beat you down&#8230;their day is over, and they know it. The American citizens just woke up from a long nightmare, and they know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Enuff</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39762</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Enuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39762</guid>
		<description>Selective memory?  Isn&#039;t this link to Dallas far weaker than Harriet Miers?  Has this blog ever mentioned her name and the serious charge against her that is a partial destruction of our Constitution. Edwards was wrong, very wrong,democrats and republicans alike agree he is not worthy to hold office, like say Larry Craig or David Vitter etc.  
I wonder if you consider lawyers that represent huge corporations that have cheated investors out of billions, including the elderly, as sleazy as you do those that protect dying asbestos workers?  
It really is the ultimate hypocrisy to see 
right wing extremist blabber on about hypocrisy, adultry, honesty, openess, and integrity.  It is almost like Richard Ramirez complaining that someone swiped his cigarettes.  When you work for a company with such a strong agenda, who has almost flapped their right wing off over this, at some point, try and remember that this is 
minor compared to the destruction caused by this administration.  Now tell me again, how great of a President you think John McCain will make?  
McClellan said that FOX News got talking points from the White House

Bush authorized rendition.

Bush authorized torture. Yes, that means waterboarding.

Bush authorized a war based on lies resulting in millions of innocent Iraqi and Afghani civilian deaths as well as an ethnic cleansing. 

Thousands of our troops have been killed or seriously injured.

The US dollar is in the tank.

The housing/mortgage crisis has almost caused a depression. 

How about the trampling of our Constitution with warrantless wiretapping?

Laptops are being confiscated at airports and the border.

Under Bush, oil companies are raking in record profits while Americans suffer.

The US attorney scandal. 

A health care epidemic.

John Edwards screws around on his wife.

Monica Goodling

A standing ovation in Congress for David Vitter’s return.

Military TV Analysts/Generals scandal. 

Larry Craig’s bathroom adventure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Selective memory?  Isn&#8217;t this link to Dallas far weaker than Harriet Miers?  Has this blog ever mentioned her name and the serious charge against her that is a partial destruction of our Constitution. Edwards was wrong, very wrong,democrats and republicans alike agree he is not worthy to hold office, like say Larry Craig or David Vitter etc.<br />
I wonder if you consider lawyers that represent huge corporations that have cheated investors out of billions, including the elderly, as sleazy as you do those that protect dying asbestos workers?<br />
It really is the ultimate hypocrisy to see<br />
right wing extremist blabber on about hypocrisy, adultry, honesty, openess, and integrity.  It is almost like Richard Ramirez complaining that someone swiped his cigarettes.  When you work for a company with such a strong agenda, who has almost flapped their right wing off over this, at some point, try and remember that this is<br />
minor compared to the destruction caused by this administration.  Now tell me again, how great of a President you think John McCain will make?<br />
McClellan said that FOX News got talking points from the White House</p>
<p>Bush authorized rendition.</p>
<p>Bush authorized torture. Yes, that means waterboarding.</p>
<p>Bush authorized a war based on lies resulting in millions of innocent Iraqi and Afghani civilian deaths as well as an ethnic cleansing. </p>
<p>Thousands of our troops have been killed or seriously injured.</p>
<p>The US dollar is in the tank.</p>
<p>The housing/mortgage crisis has almost caused a depression. </p>
<p>How about the trampling of our Constitution with warrantless wiretapping?</p>
<p>Laptops are being confiscated at airports and the border.</p>
<p>Under Bush, oil companies are raking in record profits while Americans suffer.</p>
<p>The US attorney scandal. </p>
<p>A health care epidemic.</p>
<p>John Edwards screws around on his wife.</p>
<p>Monica Goodling</p>
<p>A standing ovation in Congress for David Vitter’s return.</p>
<p>Military TV Analysts/Generals scandal. </p>
<p>Larry Craig’s bathroom adventure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Lacey</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39757</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39757</guid>
		<description>One other thing, all this stuff about how evil attorneys are is b.s.

They&#039;re our last line of defense the individual has against big business and bigger government.

I would be that if we had a slimemeter we could use to gauge slime composition in job categories lawyers would be judged at the top or at least near it for lack of sliminess.

Those in cubicles wouldn&#039;t be as lucky after the slimemeter visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing, all this stuff about how evil attorneys are is b.s.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re our last line of defense the individual has against big business and bigger government.</p>
<p>I would be that if we had a slimemeter we could use to gauge slime composition in job categories lawyers would be judged at the top or at least near it for lack of sliminess.</p>
<p>Those in cubicles wouldn&#8217;t be as lucky after the slimemeter visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey Lacey</title>
		<link>http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/2008/08/08/john-edwards-admits-affair-dallas-retiree-rejoices/comment-page-2/#comment-39756</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey Lacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontburner.dmagazine.com/?p=16182#comment-39756</guid>
		<description>Excuse me, didn&#039;t we have this same scenario, key player suspected of playing with cute hanger around, and staff forcing hang arounder being forced out of the area earlier this year?

And wasn&#039;t all the hullaboo about McCain and a blond with ambitions?

Isn&#039;t he the Republican candidate for President?

Forgive me but it seems to me that if we&#039;re going to run innuendo into the ground we need to inject into this discussion an important fact.  The democratic party didn&#039;t make the major player their candidate.  The republicans did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me, didn&#8217;t we have this same scenario, key player suspected of playing with cute hanger around, and staff forcing hang arounder being forced out of the area earlier this year?</p>
<p>And wasn&#8217;t all the hullaboo about McCain and a blond with ambitions?</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t he the Republican candidate for President?</p>
<p>Forgive me but it seems to me that if we&#8217;re going to run innuendo into the ground we need to inject into this discussion an important fact.  The democratic party didn&#8217;t make the major player their candidate.  The republicans did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk
Object Caching 336/342 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c0415030.cdn2.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com

Served from: frontburner.dmagazine.com @ 2012-02-10 07:57:52 -->
