A Star-Telegram investigation shows that the YFZ Ranch raid has so far cost the State of Texas $14 million, and the bills are still coming in. But who cares? Gov. Perry, for one, doesn’t mind.
“Any action taken to protect children is never misguided,” said Krista Piferrer, Perry’s deputy press secretary.
Forget for the moment that Ms. Piferrer sounds more like a spokeswoman for Nancy Pelosi. Amid all the things wrong with her statement stands the glaring fact that an illegal search and seizure — which both the state’s most conservative appeals court and the Texas Supreme Court have unambiguously declared the raid to be — means no guilty individuals, if any have been identified, will ever be successfully prosecuted. Good job.
Wick
Don’t you think that 13 million is a drop in the bucket compared to what this will end up costing the state of Texas. From what I read, lawyers all over the US (who are already pissed off at Texas) are anxious to start a major lawsuit.
I’m glad to see Saturday action Wick, good job.
As for the topic, what can you expect from a politician that doesn’t just embrace, he squeezes as he hugs the likes of Rod Parsley?
The very same Rod Parsley McCain had to distance himself. Parsley is the kind of flake, well the kind of flake our good governor squeezes as he hugs.
I do hope the state gets bit good and hard for the FLDS fiasco. It’s a good technique for training little kids, bite them for biting, so I don’t see why it won’t work on Texas.
Hey morons,You must be a child molester if you agree with the courts.I couldn’t careless what it cost to get those children away from those child molester.They wion’t sue because then the goverment can legally go to their sect compound and interview everyone again.Marrying a 12 or 13 year old is disgusting and illegal in Texas.
Ronnie, the courts were right. They never said it was OK to molest a child. They disagreed with the way the evidence was collected. If anything, the blame for not presenting a good case lays completely with the state of Texas, who endangered those potentially molested children and have possibly subjected many more to that same fate because they didn’t take a few additional hours to make sure the initial outcry was legit.
Those people at the YFZ ranch weren’t going anywhere. The authorities already said they had an informant on the inside. Another few weeks, perhaps, and they would have been able to execute a warrant that would stand up in court, and would have been able to do this correctly.
Wait — what evidence is there of child molestation?
All we’ve seen is accusations from CPS thugs, none of which has proven out.
There’s a word for the kind of society where accusation = guilt.
I agree, Trey. But if there was evidence – so I guess potentially should be swapped with allegedly – to be had, I think it’s forever gone now since it would’ve had to have been in the form of witness testimony.
From what I’ve read, record-keeping on the FLDS ranches is vague at best. Finding some sort of “smoking gun” is probably never going to happen.
Where is this proof of child molestation?
Did they have proof that over 450 kids were molested? Why were the young boys taken away? Did they suspect they might be pregnant? Where are the 60..no 50..no 40
no 10…no 3 girls that were undergage and pregnant?
That CPS spokesmodel is Katherine Harris all over. A media whore.
Now, if you are looking for facts, you might check on the case involving the Pastor from Prestonwood Church that was busted trying to connect with a 13 year old girl. You know it is not his first time on the playing field. I think if would be fair to call him a “moron” and a “child molester”.
Another black eye for the state of Texas as if we need anymore.
What kills me is that the judiciary is one of the most twisted, warped and embarrassing things about this country; and daily, in multiple courts across America, laws and statutes are violated and disregarded, due process rights-both procedural and substantive-are ignored, and yet in one of the rare instances that calls for bending or breaking the rules everyone is up in arms about procedure. Good heavens, is this really the scenario to make a case about procedure out of? I mean…really?
Trey & Co: Circumstancial evidence has put a man on death row in one of the most liberal states on this nation. That Texas is so gung-ho on want evidence-considering its tellar record, anyway-is ludicrous.
Oops, gung-ho on wanting substantive evidence, considering its stellar record, is how that should have appeared.
(Crowds of taxpaying villagers taking to the streets in praise of logic and balanced jornalistic reprisal following court rulings…chanting in unison:) “Wick. Wick. Wick”
Applying RONNIE’S lunge chair logic: “If they have knives in there(sic) kichen (sic) at the YFZ then I don’t careless (sic) what the court says; they are probably dismembering under age bodies with those knives and that is disgusting and illegal in Texas. Sick! Gregg Abbott for governor if we ever have to sadly loose (sic) Rick Perry”. (Sick)
So basically, you’re saying that several presumed wrongs make it OK to do it in this case, too? Interesting.
I do need to make one thing clear – I don’t think the usual rank and file CPS folk are goons. I’ve gotten to know a lot of them in my line of work, and many of them are underpaid, underappreciated and are completely invested in making sure the cases assigned to them are cared for well.
Bethany
You have a very valid point about the CPS folks. I have never met any, but I have always heard that they, like teachers are under paid. I do think you would have to have a sincere love of children and doing what is best to take on such a chore.
It always bugs me a little when a child goes missing and/or is found and law enforcement finds the need to have 20 representatives at a press conference, giving each other a pat on the back and making certain the press gets the proper spelling of their name. Sometime it seems like media overkill. This view could stem from the fact that I am an old, tired, jaded media whore myself.
No, thats not necessarily my point Bethany though I can see how it can be construed that way. I don’t think that the CPS workers-any of the state employees or enforcers in this matter-are behaving as “goons”; in fact this is a rare instance when they don’t come across as “evangelists of law enforcement” in any manner. My point is that we are asked to revere the law and it is circumvented, violated, manipulated daily-and *this* is the case everyone gets worked up about? Oy vey.
There is concern, and they acted on it. If certain procedure is broken, life goes on.
Laws are meant to be broken. This would be one of those times to find it agreeable. It happens daily, people, so apparently its not criminal…
Eva
Your logic confounds me. Again, if there is no proof that a crime existed, then 400 plus children were put in a traumatic situation for naught. If someone took away your children for something your neighbor did, would that be a law that was okay to be broken? Seems very Alberto Gonzales to me.
I was actually referring to Trey’s usage of the word “goon” Eva.
And I’m with Jack. Your logic confounds me. It also will not hold up in a court of law if you try to use it to get out of a crime, by the way. “Yeah, but he did it first,” didn’t work in third grade, and it’s not going to work here, either.
There were calls from inside the compound from, reportedly, a sixteen year old-and wasn’t she a mother?-who claimed abuse. Was it provably a hoax?
Removals and subsequent investigations aren’t necessary? Really? The FLDS are known to be saints?
CPS overstepped its bounds in its removal, otherwise the courts wouldn’t have returned the children. In this instance, the law might actually hinder as oppose to help. I side with CPS and Texas on this one.
I don’t like Perry often, but I admire his stance.
Jack, thats not the best ananlogy. This was/is, essentially, one giant incestuous family and no, I am not liberal enough to give them any credit to the contrary.
Bethany: “Yeah, but he did it first” is (sometimes) an affirmative defense ^_^
What we’re trying to say is that if the law had been followed, things might’ve stuck, and might’ve been provable. You just might have seen any victims of alleged abuse cared for in a long term way. Now, it will be nearly impossible to convict.
For one thing – they have ranches just like the one in El Dorado all over the country, as well as one in British Columbia.
Sometimes doing things the right way means things stick, and the good you do is longer lasting. What exactly was accomplished here?
You’ve made my argument-yes, they jumped to quickly. My point is that it would have been wise of the courts to recognise that upholding the law in this case will hurt as oppose to help. There are times to circumvent law, for good reasons.
I would also like to apologise if my arguments are unclear. During Football Cups, I am wherever the action is, and generally consume pint after pint-I’m about to pass out. Surely tomorrow I will read my posts and cringe a bit!
Eva
Your honesty makes you my new Sunday hero.
I think we are all on the same page. If, indeed child molestation happened, then someone needs a to be in the slammer. Law officials who break the law while trying to right another law, cost the taxpayers millions and leave the “evil doers” out in the street.
Happy fathers day and happy football cups!
Bethany, I called them thugs, because that’s what CPS and the local sheriffs have been acting like. They stormed the compound with armored vehicles, they separated children — even infants — from parents, and they’ve repeatedly lied to the public and to the courts.
If that doesn’t qualify as thuggish behavior, I don’t know what does.
You know this FLDS is a good thing in a funny, funny peculiar more than funny ha-ha as my grandma would say, kind of way.
I mean you have these thugs, as Trey so eloguently put it, busting into this compound to protect children from the evils of a closed society.
And what is this closed society all about we might ask? Isn’t it about protecting children from the evils of an open society?
It’s gotta be tough being a kid these days.
I think it’s really hard to be a kid in a closed incestuous cult. Perhaps if our thugs keep raiding, they will LEAVE.
Have we entered an alternate universe where Jack E. Jett sucks up to Wick? And, agrees with everyone? (Although he didn’t miss a predictable beat in dragging the Baptists in to something not even close to similar.) It’s nice to see in a world rife with change, somethings never do.
OK, they leave – but does that make them stop? Now we’re going all NIMBY.
I never said that they shouldn’t be stopped. I said they should be stopped through the correct application of the law, and within the bounds of that law. So far, they have no admissible evidence that will hold up in court, so the help provided may have done more harm than good.
This isn’t a situation with a black and white – there’s a very uncomfortable gray.
My uncomfortable grey is this: I hate the raid, don’t like the tip that led to it, and cringe at the idea of children ripped from “family” (a tree with few forks)…AND, I still want these people held accountable for “marriage”, (spiritual or otherwise) involving minors.
The FLDS girls (spiritual wives) apply for and receive WIC and Medicaid for the children, routinely, in Texas, Utah, Colorado, and Arizona. Their applications claim that they are not married and are not living in residence with the “father” of the children. This is yet one reason why children reside with other “parents.” It’s fraud. within FLDS circles, they refer to this as “bleeding the beast.”
If nothing else, I hope the investigation will get them off the dole.
Uncomfortable grey? Yes…but, I have a hard time dismissing the testimony of dozens of former FLDS members as to specific illegal acts at YFZ. It may indeed be very expensive, the path the State chose. However, in life, the most difficult things (the “right thing”) is usually the most difficult and expensive.
amanda
You couldn’t be more right. I have been kissing up to Wick and now you have brought attention to it. I’m a little embarrassed that you busted me on it. And, yes I do agree with everyone except Ronnie, while we all may agree that I am a moron, I am not a child molester, nor do I think anyone is that doens’t agree with the CPS in this situation. I have been a slave to the beat since YAZ came out with “Man in Uniform”.
Hope you had a great Father’s Day and have a wonderful week coming up.
I gather you have far more insight into this ranch as you know for a fact that this is an incestious ranch? Is that like that John Edwards the psychic or do you have a pervadar? Either way, you could be of great service to CPS with this skill. I’m not kidding. I think we can all agree that the state needs all the help they can get on this case that started with a prank phone call and ended up with over 450 children placed in unusual surroundings with total strangers. The state of Texas would never do anything so absurd if they didn’t have all the facts and all their ducks in a row.
You know, like Waco. If someone came into my house and tried taking my kids without the proper documentation, I might consider that kidnapping and a nightmare.
http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2008/06/have-pity-for-bullies.html
Jack, why do you think they did DNA on 430 children? For fun?
Nice to see you are back to your old tricks.
amanda
I don’t think the DNA test were for fun. I assume at some point we will find out what they were for. My view is that it just seems like a bit of overkill. I really don’t understand how that puts me back to my old tricks, sucking up to Wick, are has another alternative universe to be created.
I am sure your animosity towards me is validated even though I don’t understand what it has to do with the subject at hand.
I will say that if I have said something to antagonize you, I am sorry. Let’s try and disagree with a sense of humor.
All my tricks are old, just like me. I prefer not to name names here though.
Jack, most, if not all of your “insights” eventually lead to 1) a personal attack, 2) a refernce to Baptists, and 3)some tie-in to your sexuality. None of which edify or advance a discussion…
For more information on 1,2,3 see your above posts.
amanda
You are right. Sometimes I do 1,2 and 3 in the same sentence.
I guess I got confused when you seemed upset that I had agreed with someone.
So if I refrain from posting;
a) a personal attack on anyone
b) never bash a religion
c) keep my sexuality to myself
Will you be okay with me posting my opinion even if it may differ from yours? Because I think I can do that. I can be a good boy.
And my apology to the CPS.
Post away, Jack, just don’t make it about yourself (or anyone else)…just the topic at hand.
Yes mam.
Thank you mam.
That’s what I like to hear. You should go huntin’ or fishin’ with my other half. Of course, you would be in in an fabulous ensemble by Robert Graham, camo with a preppy stripe, but both men would happily dive into a plate of calf fries at a truck stop in west Texas and discuss what a bitch I am.
Wait….did you just make the post about him?
And,Bethany wins! Gotcha takes over converstation, debate or wit! Collect 200 bucks as you pass go…
And what about those darn FLDS?
I am confused. A man named Ronnie writes every one on this blog a moron and child molester yuck yet this Amanda is on someone’s ass because they mentioned their sexuality.
Where is the sexuality talk? Isn’t calling someone child molester a huge personal attack. I must be missing something.