So says the Dallas Federal Reserve, as reported by the DBJ. I swear — swear — I’m not trying to stir up the anti-immigrant jihadists, but what was your point again?
76 Comments to “Texas Unemployment Lowest In 25 Years”
DriveBy@ May 8th, 2008 at 9:52 am
After I went through the Whataburger drive through yesterday and they got my order wrong for the third time in as many trips (how hard is it to make a number 1 plain and dry?) I started to wonder if the unemployment rate was TOO low. I think I have my answer now.
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 9:57 am
Scroll down a bit and read the post about the all-Mexican Wal-Mart in the constantly degrading, third-world ‘burb of Garland.
Perhaps if unfettered immigration was allowed to over-run Highland Park, you’d see where the rest of us are coming from. However, all you see is an abundance of maids and landscapers.
LeftOut@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:06 am
Wick, you left out one important word in your post. Illegal. I think most people are okay with LEGAL immigration. It’s the whole “entering the country illegally, paying no tax or social security, clogging up the healthcare and judicial systems” issue that bugs most of us. I’m sure it was just a oversight on your part, though.
Lee, Dallas, Texas@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:13 am
Perhaps I am reading to much into prior comments, but is seems to me that Left Out’s opposition to “illegal” immigration is a cover for the kind of anti Mexican ideas shown by SB. These people are here, so we cannot ignore them. Their childern must be educated to become good, tax paying citizens in the future.
Mark@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:35 am
Wick,
I don’t the issue is so much economic as it is about the cultural fabric of our country. The flood of Mexican immigrants entering our country illegally creates an environment in which new immigrants are not forced to assimilate, but, instead, retreat to mini-Mexicos within our state. Drive through Balch Springs sometime, and you’ll see what I’m talking about. In my opinion, this kind of Balkanization isn’t good for the long-term health of our Republic, whatever its positive economic effects.
LeftOut@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:40 am
Not a “cover” Lee, just the truth. I am 100% in favor of the American dream being made available to legal immigrants, no matter what country they are from. It’s the whole breaking the law by entering our country illegally that I have a BIG problem with.
Manny@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:42 am
Here it comes again…
“It’s the whole “entering the country illegally, paying no tax or social security, clogging up the healthcare and judicial systems” issue that bugs most of us.” & “The flood of Mexican immigrants entering our country illegally creates an environment in which new immigrants are not forced to assimilate, but, instead, retreat to mini-Mexicos within our state.”
LEFTOUT - I pay taxes and I don’t have kids, I pay social security and will probably never get it, I pay health insurance and rarely use it and have never been inside a courthouse… I want my refund now!!!!
MARK - have you ever been to West, TX? They are know as a “Czech town”; have you ever been to Boston? They are known as an “Irish” town; heck there is even a town called “Polish Town in NY”… WTF?
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:46 am
Lee, I think I tend to agree with LeftOut just a bit. With that said, we obviously can’t deport kids who were born here. Because of that, we cannot deport their parents. But, we can’t just sit here an do nothing anymore.
I think the quickest way to resolve the problem (and erase our debt) is to legalize those who are already here and have a strong policy moving forward. Imagine all the revenue when millions of new taxpayers hit the system.
Daniel@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:50 am
A Wick post or a Trey post (where’s Trey?) can be identified in 3/10 of a second, by the header alone. IJS. Further elaboration available upon request.
LeftOut, give it a rest.You claim to be just fine with brown-skinned foreigners so long as they’re documented, but I’d wager you’re the first to bleat “No backdoor amnesty! No backdoor amnesty!” if a plan is proposed to actually help them become legal.
Correct me if I’m wrong, which I may be — but I doubt it.
The Mexican Wal-Mart is merely a response to market demand. Funny how the free market is all-knowing, wise and inviolable when someone dares suggest pollution caps on industry, but it’s an outrage when the end result is fresh tortillas, Spanish signage and the omnipresence of really bad music with accordions.
Sky Masterson@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Yeah, legalizing all the illegal immigrants will surely solve the problem. Just like it did in 1986 with the Immigration and Reform Control Act when Senator Ted Kennedy said:
“This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.”
Dallasite@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:57 am
How can unemployment be so low? I mean, if you read the news you’d think we were in a great depression right now.
The media’s job is to sell fear. That fear is mostly ********, but they’ll keep shoveling it to us until we refuse to believe them anymore.
Lee, Dallas, Texas@ May 8th, 2008 at 10:57 am
Left Out and Huh, I respect your views. However, I do not think that they are representative of many arguing about “illegal” immigrants. Recently there was an anonymous flyer circulating around the Marsh/Walnut Hill area, protesting the new grocery store going in, Carnival or Fiesta. The tone of the flyer was that the store would ruin the neighborhood by attracting undesirables. In fact the neighborhood has become heavily Hispanic already. It is hard to draw a line between anti Hispanic and anti illegal immigration in many cases. I am reminded of the people who years ago opposed the track in the park at the Tollway and University, because “you know what kind of people go to trackmeets.” I actually heard that. Same situation in many respects.
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:00 am
“Perhaps I am reading to much into prior comments, but is seems to me that Left Out’s opposition to “illegal” immigration is a cover for the kind of anti Mexican ideas shown by SB. ”
It’s the Mexican’s that have turned my hometown into a $hithole. Should I direct that blame at other racial groups for the sake of being “un-biased”, when they had nothing to do with it?
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Sky, I hear you. But, your simple statement is why it continues to be a problem. Here are the kinds of statements I have heard recently:
“Simple amnesty doesn’t work, we need a better idea.”
“You can’t deport millions of people, it’s just not right. We need another solution.”
“These people have done a lot of work to make this country what it is, we have to give them some respect. We can’t leave the problem alone, but we need to stop attacking them.”
“You can’t just build a wall.”
“You can’t punish employers for hiring illegals because it will cause inflation and cutbacks.”
So, who/what/when/where? Do we just continue to do nothing for eternity because the two of us can’t agree? At least an imperfect solution is an attempt at something. Sitting around b1tching about it is getting really, REALLY old. We need a politician with a backbone (from either side of the agrument).
I had something great to say, but now I can only think about how hungry I am for Whataburger.
Sky Masterson@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:09 am
Do the supporters of illegal immigration support it for all countries or just for those from Mexico? Would you also advocate opening up the borders to illegals from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Somalia, etc.?
I would actually support amnesty for everyone already here– but only after we become serious about getting control of our border and complete the wall. No sense discussing about what to do with the water in the tub until the spigot is turned off.
Daniel@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:19 am
One thing we need to do is to heavily tax those envio-dinero-a-Mexico places. Send a wire transfer to a foreign country, pay a 19% tax. Dedicate a small portion of the proceeds to setting up free ESL classes. Dedicate much of the revenues to defraying the burden illegal immigrants place on targeted social services.
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:19 am
SB - Are you so sure it’s a “mexican” thing? I tend to think it’s a price-point issue.
I have friends who purchased in Wylie less than five years ago (new construction), and their neighborhoods are already $hitholes. Less educated people tent to make less money and move into more affordable communities. Less educated people tend to have a higher tolerance for everything from teen pregnancy to couches in their front yards (and crime).
I’m pretty sure other low income people would have moved into those neighborhoods if hispanics had not.
Daniel@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:25 am
SB, your hometown turned into a sh*thole and then the immigrants came for the affordable, poorly aged (sh*thole) housing stock.
Unless, of course, an army of dishwashers bought up block after block of $400k homes and systematically degraded them.
Wylie H.@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Here’s an interesting factoid: illegal immigrants prop up Social Security to the tune of $13 billion per annum.
I couldn’t agree more Sky. But, I would also be for opening the borders if everyone would pay taxes. This country used to have a very “open door” to immigrants. We turned very few people away.
My whole point is we need a solution to the problem that will give me as many rights as an illegal immigrant. Right now, I have to show ID to rent or buy a home. Illegal immigrants don’t. I have to pay taxes to the federal government to the tune of 20%-30%, illegal immigrants don’t. I pay property tax to a school district that is setting up ESL classes for children of illegal immigrants WHO DON”T PAY PROPERTY OR FEDERAL TAXES.
I don’t have a problem with paying everything I do, I just don’t feel illegal immigrants making 30% less than me annually should get breaks just because we don’t want to hurt their effing feelings.
Dallasite@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:29 am
At the end of the day, we should do what is in the best interest of the United States, not necessarily what is in the best interest of the illegal immigrants. If we truly need more laborers then we should set up a guest worker program to accommodate that need. If we should control our borders to better monitor who comes and goes, then that should be a priority as well.
There may be racism on both sides, but the main arguments have absolutely nothing to do with race.
Tom@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:32 am
So we don’t want “those people” coming in to earn money and spending it? Would we have a remodeled Wal-Mart in Garland and a new grocery store in what was previously a closed, vacated Albertsons store at Marsh and Walnut Hill?
The jobs and sales tax revenue created by the new stores are positive. If you don’t like growth and expansion of the local population and economy (whether it be by primarily English or Spanish-speaking residents), there’s plenty of room in Detroit or the rural Midwest, where populations are shrinking, unemployment is rising, tax bases are evaporating and property values are tanking.
I think that’s what Wick’s post was saying in the first place.
Wylie H.@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:35 am
How are we going to replace the $13 billion annual contribution to Social Security made by these illegal immigrants? As an aside, unlike legal residents, it doesn’t appear that these folks have any entitlement to benefits, so this is basically an outright subsidy by the illegal immigrants to legal residents.
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:44 am
Wylie - Are you saying the majority of illegal immigrants are paid by normal check with standard deductions? That the maids, construction workers, landscapers and whatnot paid by cash on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis? Because that would be the only way they are paying for their medicaid and welfare.
AND, are you saying the cost to set up ESL in all local school districts are paid for by anyone other than the legal home owners?
I would love to review your research. Can you provide me with a link or something?
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:46 am
You are aware that illegal immigrants are basically this century’s slave labor, right? And yet, anyone who argues against it is a racist? Makes a lot of sense to me.
Tom@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:47 am
Renters — legal or illegal — pay property taxes as part of their rent, whether said rent is paid for by cash, money order, or personal check.
Adam@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:51 am
For those who cling to “illegality” as the keystone issue, keep in mind that “legality” and “illegality” are abstract categories of status only, and as such are subject to change. (If you have brown eyes, you have brown eyes no matter what anyone says. But if you have, say, a license to practice law, you only have such status because enough of the rest of agree that you do.) I’m not saying the distinction between “legality” and “illegality” isn’t a concept to which we must all adhere (at least theoretically), in order for society to function smoothly–what I’m saying is that laws can be changed, and are, in fact, constantly being changed. Slavery used to be legal. So pose yourselves this hypothetical: if, for whatever reason, the federal government were to suddenly grant citizenship to all currently illegal aliens as of tomorrow, suddenly making their status fully legal, would your objections to those people just as suddenly evaporate into thin air? If you can honestly answer “yes,” not in this comment column, but in your heart of hearts, then so be it. But I and many others doubt it very sincerely.
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:52 am
Tom - I stand corrected. The property taxes are being paid, so I should have thought that one through.
To that same point, don’t we have homeowners and renters rights? The whole reason the “slum lord” precautions were put in place? If someone is not legally here, and we don’t know they are here, and we don’t know they are renting, how can we protect those rights?
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 11:59 am
Good question Adam. If it is in reference to me, I don’t object to “people.” I object to crime.
I fully believe illegal immigrants are guilty of tax evasion. Would you or I not be prosecuted if we continuously refused to pay federal tax?
So, if illegal immigrants were put into the federal tax base and started paying taxes on their next check, I would fully support them and their right to live and work in this country.
Derek@ May 8th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Huh? - http://www.reason.org/commenta.....0501.shtml
Try that link for some stats on taxes paid by illegal immigrants, most studies show that the majority do pay income taxes. In addition they certainly pay property taxes as a portion of their rent, and sales tax for ever item they buy.
Dave Thomas@ May 8th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Wick, you are so wrong. The folks you deride are upset over ILLEGAL immigration. Like so many liberals you tend to leave off a word like that to paint your opponents on this issue with a broad brush. I am not opposed to immigrants or immigration. I am opposed to illegal immigrants and illegal immigration. I have no problem with a legal immigrant getting a job in this country. I have an enormous problem with an illegal immigrant getting a job in this country.
1. You totally sounded like my tenth grade gym teacher, after he caught us cheating at bowling.
2. Wick’s a liberal?
Grant@ May 8th, 2008 at 12:13 pm
Huh? - Who is this “we” that knows people are renting and is protecting those rights? When I rented an apartment in the past I do not recall registering with any entity charged with protecting “renters rights.”
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
I never questioned the sales tax, and I am a little amazed to read two-thirds pay federal income tax. But I do question the story from the link.
Illegal immigrants account for 10% of the social security surplus? Really?
And the author inferred the government is milking the illegal immigrants as they don’t collect social security because of fake identities. Really? The cost of free emergency care for all 12 million doesn’t outweigh the supposed taxes being paid by eight million? And are they all licensed drivers? Insured motorists? Etc?
I know people who hire maids. They don’t pay by check. I know people who have discounted landscapers. They don’t pay by check. I also have never rented or purchased a home without being required to give a copy of my driver’s license and social security number.
The day every person has to do the same is the day I feel better. And I don’t give a d@mn if they are poor people from Mexico or rich people from England.
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
Hasn’t something gone fundamentally wrong this the politically correct game when liberals argue for the continued exploitation of a minority race of people in the name of equal rights?
Huh? - So you consider giving the landlord a copy of your driver’s license and social security as a way of making sure “we” know you are here and can protect your “renters rights”?
I would guess the landlord wanted to use that information to check your credit, not to pass it along to “we” so that “we” could protect you from the landlord.
Unemployment rates, immigration… those arguments are the Red Herring to the real problems in our culture… namely, education and the rapidly growing chasm between the rich and poor.
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Exactly, DM. And I don’t see how continuing to import an undereducated workforce who are allowed to fly under the radar (to their own detriment as much as ours) and who will work for pennies on the dollar is going to help solve those problems anytime soon.
Bill@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Unemployment in Texas would be even lower if we adopted the same immigration reform laws that Oklahoma passed(HB 1804). The pro-immigration activists cried that this would cause the Oklahoma economy to grind to a halt. That Oklahoma “needed” illegals. That never materialized. The result of the law is that Oklahoma unemployment has dropped to 3.1 % in March 2008, down from 4.0% in March 2007.
Hamburgers in Oklahoma now don’t cost $18, the lawns still get mowed, the pools still get cleaned.
Fact is, getting rid of illegal aliens put Americans back to work.
So you’re saying because of that bill, and that bill alone, unemployment dropped in Oklahoma?
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
He’s not saying that the bill explains the drop in unemployment. It just dispels the myth from the pro-immigration alarmists that unemployment would be rampant if we cracked down on illegal immigrants. The biggest lie being told in America is that “immigrants do jobs that Americans don’t want or refuse to do.” The numbers in Oklahoma seems to provide evidence that that isn’t the case.
“The result of the law is that Oklahoma unemployment has dropped to 3.1 % in March 2008, down from 4.0% in March 2007.”
That is what he said.
However, if you actually look at those state reports, those decreases in unemployment rates are attributed to employers adding NEW jobs. In Oklahoma, there were jobs added in every sector except manufacturing.
I’m not saying that its not a myth, or that it is. I’m just saying that I’m certain the drop in the unemployment rate in Oklahoma has as much weight in this debate.
For one thing, are you sure illegal immigrants are really going to be the ones claiming unemployment benefits - with that whole pesky “might get picked up by ICE” thing?
That’s how unemployment is measured on those reports, by and large - claims for unemployment benefits.
GMOM@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
How did “we” work it when “we” let practically the whole State of Florida arrive from Cuba? And still coming. And don’t forget they were some of the peeps in the Cuban jails and criminals. Remember? The Cuban Mafia? Did they get a free pass, did they all become good citizens, are they all paying taxes and speaking English? They are here because their country is effed up and so is Mexico. Are “we” too PC to try to make those countries make things better so their peeps want to stay in their countries of birth, you know they all want to be in their homeland. Not the Land of Plenty where everyone picks on them. Right?
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
So Oklahoma has added almost 16,000 jobs this year, while at the same time eliminating what pro-immigration folks call an essential part of our workforce, and unemployment still went down? So, who exactly are filling all of these brand new jobs? Could it be hard-working Americans? Wow, that’s a novel concept.
Amy S@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Listen to this: (www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=90216206&m=90216202) from NPR about the growth in the US population in the next few years. For several years most of the Hispanic growth in Texas has been from children born in the US, not brought to the US. As such, these children are legal citizens with full rights to stay, and at a future date, vote. The students who marched out of school a couple of years ago didn’t leave because they were being denied rights, but because the discussion was to make their illegally immigrated parents FELONS. I think we’re missing the real cultural change.
SB - nice try with the “enslavement” argument, but it’s so disingenuous considering the truly pitiful lives these people would lead in their home countries. Nice try to be a nice guy, though.
Hey! there’s a red nav bar at the bottom of the page! who knew?!
Bill@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Bethany,
I think you need to educate yourself more on the HB 1804 issue. Oklahoma got tough with it’s illegal alien problems, most of them left, the economy did not skip a beat.
Usually by this point in the discussion, someone will make a jack-boot-thug reference to ICE or law enforcement. Fact is, illegal alien arrests have gone down 50% since the law took effect. They left and also took other problems that follow them around with them. Crystal meth arrests dropped 75%(since the suppliers from Mexico left), uninsured motorist accidents have dropped 60%, burglaries dropped 25%. The stats go on and on.
The pro-immigration folks hold our ability to enforce federal law by creating a myth around the lie that the illegal alien is the backbone of our economy. That is false. Pro-immigration folks hold our economy hostage with a gun to it’s head. What we are too dumb to realize is that the gun is unloaded. Click-click-click.
Lee, Dallas, Texas@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
Somehow I have the feeling that lots of those who are opposed to immigration that is “illegal” just because it is the law, are inclined to drive 70 to 90 mph down the Tollway and Central. The speed limit is the law and to drive over it is “illegal”. We all pick and chose what laws we obey. Society operates best when the majority agree on what laws to obey. The public’s disregarding of some laws can result in changes, such as the repeal of prohibition. Laws can be changed to reflect what is best for society.
Rawlins Reality Realty@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:43 pm
I wish I had grown up hanging with Wick. Together we would have tossed cherry bombs into neighbors’ ponds and then shot our ‘B B’ guns at the goldfish that shot into the air.
As I post these…46 posts on this three line thread? I mean…Trey could not get that with a one liner like “taking a gun into a church is a God given right and I will shoot any priest, preacher or rabbi who tries to stop me”. Or Time with “I used to Southlake. Now I hate Coppell”. What about Zac posting “The reason Schutze blow smoke out his ass is because that’s where I crush out my butts”.
Let’s stir up this joint with incite-full media button pushers!
SB@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:44 pm
“SB - nice try with the “enslavement” argument, but it’s so disingenuous considering the truly pitiful lives these people would lead in their home countries. Nice try to be a nice guy, though.”
Seriously, that’s your argument. You’re one notch away saying the original slaves actually had it better on American plantations because their lives in the African wild were so harsh.
We’re a country that loves to protest child labor and foreign sweat shops, while at the same time standing up for the right to pay someone $3 an hour to work 80 hour weeks in grueling physical conditions. I just think if you’re gonna argue on a platform of human rights, then you should go all the way. You think these people deserve to be here, but you don’t give a $hit whether or not they are paid or treated fairly.
It must be hard to walk that tightrope nonstop.
Rawlins in Blunderland correction@ May 8th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
I wish I had grown up hanging with Wick. Together we would have tossed cherry bombs into neighbors’ ponds and then shot our ‘B B’ guns at the goldfish that shot into the air.
As I post this there are already what…46 posts on this three line thread? I mean…Trey could not get that with a one liner like “taking a gun into a church is a God given right and I will shoot any priest, preacher or rabbi who tries to stop me”.
Or Tim with “I used to Southlake. Now I hate Coppell”.
What about Zac posting “The reason Schutze blows smoke out his ass is because that’s where I crush out my butts”.
Let’s stir up this joint with incite-full media button pushers!
Um… I wasn’t a math major - and only dabbled in econ, but anytime you have more jobs than you have available, qualified workforce, you will have a lowered unemployment rate.
So it stands to reason that a combination of new jobs and new legislation reducing the available workforce pool would indeed result in a lower UNemployment rate, for there would be more jobs floating out there, available.
The unknown is how many of the jobs that were made available to hard-working Americans that may have previously been under the purvey of an illegal immigrant were actually filled. With an unemployment rate that low, it could be that the new jobs were filled by “hard-working Americans,” and the majority of these other jobs are still out there, unfilled.
Those unemployment numbers really don’t tell you one way or another.
So I really don’t think the myth can be proclaimed once and for all “busted” based on numbers from Oklahoma.
I didn’t say anything about the legislation, Bill. I said that it wasn’t entirely what pushed Oklahoma’s lower unemployment rate.
Moses@ May 8th, 2008 at 2:10 pm
no, sb, the biggest lie is blonde hair, blue eyed Jesus. that one still causes pause.
someone please give me voltaire’s quote on opinions.
Daniel@ May 8th, 2008 at 2:28 pm
Are “we” too PC to try to make those countries make things better so their peeps want to stay in their countries of birth, you know they all want to be in their homeland.
Legalize and regulate recreational drugs in this country, watch as the Mexican drug cartels die, and then see the American investment capital flow into legitimate economic enterprises in Mexico.
Balk at that first part? Then expect more of the same and learn to love it.
SB, I think — well, I’m pretty sure — something died under my house. It’s near the center of the house and I’m too much of a weenie to crawl under there, let alone drag out the bloated, maybe-about-to-explode carcass of who-knows-what. I’d be glad to pay you, or anyone you might know who’s desperate for work, the legitimate American minimum wage to do this disgusting and somewhat dangerous job. I promise to file a W-whatever-it-is come next April. Pickupthephonegiveusacall.
Jason@ May 8th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
So Oklahoma passed a law, and all of the illegal immigrants left? Really? Hmmm. Right.
You know, the US passed laws against drugs and prostitution too…that sure took care of that problem.
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Lee -
“We all pick and chose what laws we obey.”
Yes, we do. And, I am willing to use the legal system to get out of/pay the ticket when the time comes. Your argument would only make sense if you then decided not to give me a ticket because you didn’t want to offend me.
GMOM -
I’m not opposed to immigration. I am opposed to both sides saying there is a problem and yet nobody is strong enough to come up with a plan (without offending). Skrew offending somebody, lets just put a plan in place so we can put some closure on the undocumented humans living/working in our country.
Grant -
You may have solved Farmer’s Branches problem. Pass a law requiring a “credit” check for all renters. Then we wouldn’t REALLY be looking for an ID to make sure the renter is a legal citizen, we would merely be checking their payment history. Really. Why wouldn’t that work?
All -
I had lunch today at a local sandwich shop. The person who prepared my meal was not illegal. As a matter of fact, he wasn’t hispanic. But, after that experience, maybe DriveBy was right…..the unemployment rate is too low. As a matter of fact, maybe an illegal immigrant would have understood when I said “no lettuce, add peppers.” BTW - I got extra lettuce and no peppers.
Moses@ May 8th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
huh, you mean these aliens do GOOD wotk, too? stop it!
Jason@ May 8th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
I wonder what that ancient great sandal wearin’ liberal woulda said? Oh wait, I think I know…
Leviticus (19:33-4):”And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself.”
(Ex. 22:21); “Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt”
(Ex. 23:9); “Do not oppress an alien: you yourselves know how it feels to be aliens”
Then there’s that pesky Matthew 25:31–46 that says to mistreat the “stranger” is to mistreat Christ
I guess you’ve always got Romans 13:1-7 which states to obey the laws of the government….EXCEPT for that pesky Acts 5:29, which makes an exception for laws that obstruct God’s will. In this case, I suggest re-reading the first three.
Amen.
Wylie H.@ May 8th, 2008 at 3:14 pm
Information related to the substantial taxes paid by illegal immigrants has already been posted.
Here is a link to one of numerous research studies which suggest that incarceration rates for foreign-born individuals residing in the U.S. (both legal and illegal) are FAR greater than incarceration rates for native-born Americans:
and yes, I realize Lev., and Ex. are Old Testament. But Matthew is anything but…
Bill@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Jason,
Galatians 1:9 “As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!”
Pretty much cuttin’ and pastin’ the old saw scriptures that liberals dig up to throw in the face of those who favor tougher immigration enforcement is EXACTLY what Galatians is talking about.
Oh My Eyes@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
The truth of the matter is this:
Unemployment rates are all contrived BULLCRAP. LIES. LIES, and more LIES.
If you find yourself unemployed, and are not able to find a job in six months…then you become PERMANENTLY retired according to the Government folks that keep records of such things.
The hubby is trying to get Social Security disability, and the government does nothing but throw up road blocks…and they are doing the same thing with folks trying to get unemployment help.
I love my country….but I truly hate my government, and what it has become….but I don’t blame the illegals.
I instead blame the tax benefits that allowed companies to move highly trained jobs offshore. I blame the State…which sure doesn’t mind hiring illegals when it suits their purposes…..such as road construction, and maintenance.
And I blame the current administration, who funded a phony war so Halliburton, and other businesses that Cheney and Bush Jr and Sr were involved with….which just funneled more and more tax money away from the people and into the pockets of corporate bloodsuckers.
Do I sound bitter? Hell yes I am bitter! Bitter, and under employed.
Jason@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:16 pm
Oh yeah, Bill…right. I buy it…but do you think God will?
Justify your hate all you want, but something tells me the guy you worship lived his life to fight oppressing the poor and oppressed.
Something tells me you’re gonna have A LOT of explaning to do when in line at those golden gates. Be sure to quote Galatians on your way down.
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Just a couple of thoughts on “Oh My Eyes.”
First, I wish you and your hubby all the best. Being unemployed or disabled has to be tough and I hope things get much better for you.
With that said……if a person is unemployed for more than six months, they might want to start setting the bar a little lower. I have been unemployed for months at a time, but there is a point when I have to take a job to take care of my family. I wouldn’t want to flip burgers or wait tables, but if it’s that’s only thing I could find………..
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Hey Jason, you should let Bill and the Big Guy discuss his interpretation of the Bible when he gets there. It gives the whole forum tired head.
Oh My Eyes@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Huh:
We don’t live in Dallas anymore…we could not afford it.
Setting the bar too high?
Would you expect a Dr’s assistant to work at Braum’s, and maintain a household with that kind of money?
Would you ask a highly trained technician who made $20 an hour to live on wages from WalMart?
And what about all those computer programmers, and analysts who are highly trained in specific fields? They can’t just go get another job without taking a horrific pay cut.
The hubby was a highly trained specialist in a small town, where there is just one company that does his line of work. Even if he COULD work (although the steel rods in his back make lifting, bending, stooping, and standing for long is now impossible), what could he do in the podunk town we now live in?
And moving is out of the question, as we now live on family owned land…for which we pay no rent.
It is really easy to point the finger at Illegal aliens…but in the screwed up work situation in this country illegals are not the main issue: Corporate greed is.
Huh?@ May 8th, 2008 at 4:46 pm
For the record, I have not blamed any work situation on illegal immigrants. I don’t have a problem with people working in this county, just working and not paying taxes.
As for your situation, I do wish you the best. I was being sincere. If your husband can’t work because of a disability, then he can’t work. I know it takes months and months and many doctor reviews before it gets approved, I hope you are almost through that process.
Daniel@ May 8th, 2008 at 5:38 pm
Wait a minute, I just had my own personal Wachovia Road to Damascus Moment*. Now I understand deep in my heart: God on High is deeply aggrieved by Spanish-language storefronts!
He truly does see every sparrow that falls.
* Who says corporate naming rights have gone too far? God doesn’t think so — and now that I’m Born Again (TM), I consider myself qualified to speak for him.
LoC@ May 8th, 2008 at 5:50 pm
Jason: “Something tells me you’re gonna have A LOT of explaning to do when in line at those golden gates. Be sure to quote Galatians on your way down.”
Unless God’s redirected the gatway to heaven through San Francisco, I believe it’s the pearly gates I hope to pass through, not the golden gates.
You see I do real work. Girls can’t do the kind of work I do. In fact the only people I can find that can do the kind of work that I do is usually an immigrant from south of the border and more often than not they’re here illegally.
The reason most of the Americans can’t do the kind of work that I do is because they were raised by their mothers. There’s something lost when daddy isn’t around for a boy growing up.
The first thing the men from south of the border bring to the table, work table, is they respect the work. Stop and think real hard for a minute, concentrate, now tell me when was the last time you met an American who respected the work?
One of the benefits of respecting the work is inherently there is a respect for those who have been doing the work the longest, elders if you will.
Just last week I had some masons on a job I’m doing. I knew something was up when the radio started blasting out hip hop instead of mariachi married to country rock.
The father gave me the same stuff all the mexicanos give me when they find out I work by myself. He called me greedy.
It took me awhile, not the sharpest knife in the toolbox all the time, but I finally figured out why the mexicanos saw me as greedy.
You see norte americanos see someone with a good job and they want a pay check. They want you to give them money.
The hispanicos see it differently. If you have work you have a responsiblity to share it. You have a responsiblity to share the opportunity to work.
There’s a big difference between sharing opportunity to work and sharing money, completely different concepts.
It didn’t take me long to put together the older man sitting in the truck smoking his cigarette between catnaps was the father. The young man with the hip hop irritating the bejezzuz out of me was his son.
There’s something about a soldier. It might be the measuring look they return when you shake their hand. Heck, it might be the chip on the shoulder. But there’s something about a soldier. I picked it up when I explained to the masons the way I wanted them to do what I wanted them to do. The son has just finished his military commitment and he’s working with his dad until college starts this fall.
I’d bet the pants against the underwear that the father was once an illegal. And the son got his work ethic from his father. That’s because girls can’t do the work I do. Neither can the boys they raise on their own.
After I went through the Whataburger drive through yesterday and they got my order wrong for the third time in as many trips (how hard is it to make a number 1 plain and dry?) I started to wonder if the unemployment rate was TOO low. I think I have my answer now.
Scroll down a bit and read the post about the all-Mexican Wal-Mart in the constantly degrading, third-world ‘burb of Garland.
http://frontburner.dmagazine.c.....n-garland/
Perhaps if unfettered immigration was allowed to over-run Highland Park, you’d see where the rest of us are coming from. However, all you see is an abundance of maids and landscapers.
Wick, you left out one important word in your post. Illegal. I think most people are okay with LEGAL immigration. It’s the whole “entering the country illegally, paying no tax or social security, clogging up the healthcare and judicial systems” issue that bugs most of us. I’m sure it was just a oversight on your part, though.
Perhaps I am reading to much into prior comments, but is seems to me that Left Out’s opposition to “illegal” immigration is a cover for the kind of anti Mexican ideas shown by SB. These people are here, so we cannot ignore them. Their childern must be educated to become good, tax paying citizens in the future.
Wick,
I don’t the issue is so much economic as it is about the cultural fabric of our country. The flood of Mexican immigrants entering our country illegally creates an environment in which new immigrants are not forced to assimilate, but, instead, retreat to mini-Mexicos within our state. Drive through Balch Springs sometime, and you’ll see what I’m talking about. In my opinion, this kind of Balkanization isn’t good for the long-term health of our Republic, whatever its positive economic effects.
Not a “cover” Lee, just the truth. I am 100% in favor of the American dream being made available to legal immigrants, no matter what country they are from. It’s the whole breaking the law by entering our country illegally that I have a BIG problem with.
Here it comes again…
“It’s the whole “entering the country illegally, paying no tax or social security, clogging up the healthcare and judicial systems” issue that bugs most of us.” & “The flood of Mexican immigrants entering our country illegally creates an environment in which new immigrants are not forced to assimilate, but, instead, retreat to mini-Mexicos within our state.”
LEFTOUT - I pay taxes and I don’t have kids, I pay social security and will probably never get it, I pay health insurance and rarely use it and have never been inside a courthouse… I want my refund now!!!!
MARK - have you ever been to West, TX? They are know as a “Czech town”; have you ever been to Boston? They are known as an “Irish” town; heck there is even a town called “Polish Town in NY”… WTF?
Lee, I think I tend to agree with LeftOut just a bit. With that said, we obviously can’t deport kids who were born here. Because of that, we cannot deport their parents. But, we can’t just sit here an do nothing anymore.
I think the quickest way to resolve the problem (and erase our debt) is to legalize those who are already here and have a strong policy moving forward. Imagine all the revenue when millions of new taxpayers hit the system.
A Wick post or a Trey post (where’s Trey?) can be identified in 3/10 of a second, by the header alone. IJS. Further elaboration available upon request.
LeftOut, give it a rest.You claim to be just fine with brown-skinned foreigners so long as they’re documented, but I’d wager you’re the first to bleat “No backdoor amnesty! No backdoor amnesty!” if a plan is proposed to actually help them become legal.
Correct me if I’m wrong, which I may be — but I doubt it.
The Mexican Wal-Mart is merely a response to market demand. Funny how the free market is all-knowing, wise and inviolable when someone dares suggest pollution caps on industry, but it’s an outrage when the end result is fresh tortillas, Spanish signage and the omnipresence of really bad music with accordions.
Yeah, legalizing all the illegal immigrants will surely solve the problem. Just like it did in 1986 with the Immigration and Reform Control Act when Senator Ted Kennedy said:
“This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this.”
How can unemployment be so low? I mean, if you read the news you’d think we were in a great depression right now.
The media’s job is to sell fear. That fear is mostly ********, but they’ll keep shoveling it to us until we refuse to believe them anymore.
Left Out and Huh, I respect your views. However, I do not think that they are representative of many arguing about “illegal” immigrants. Recently there was an anonymous flyer circulating around the Marsh/Walnut Hill area, protesting the new grocery store going in, Carnival or Fiesta. The tone of the flyer was that the store would ruin the neighborhood by attracting undesirables. In fact the neighborhood has become heavily Hispanic already. It is hard to draw a line between anti Hispanic and anti illegal immigration in many cases. I am reminded of the people who years ago opposed the track in the park at the Tollway and University, because “you know what kind of people go to trackmeets.” I actually heard that. Same situation in many respects.
“Perhaps I am reading to much into prior comments, but is seems to me that Left Out’s opposition to “illegal” immigration is a cover for the kind of anti Mexican ideas shown by SB. ”
It’s the Mexican’s that have turned my hometown into a $hithole. Should I direct that blame at other racial groups for the sake of being “un-biased”, when they had nothing to do with it?
Sky, I hear you. But, your simple statement is why it continues to be a problem. Here are the kinds of statements I have heard recently:
“Simple amnesty doesn’t work, we need a better idea.”
“You can’t deport millions of people, it’s just not right. We need another solution.”
“These people have done a lot of work to make this country what it is, we have to give them some respect. We can’t leave the problem alone, but we need to stop attacking them.”
“You can’t just build a wall.”
“You can’t punish employers for hiring illegals because it will cause inflation and cutbacks.”
So, who/what/when/where? Do we just continue to do nothing for eternity because the two of us can’t agree? At least an imperfect solution is an attempt at something. Sitting around b1tching about it is getting really, REALLY old. We need a politician with a backbone (from either side of the agrument).
I had something great to say, but now I can only think about how hungry I am for Whataburger.
Do the supporters of illegal immigration support it for all countries or just for those from Mexico? Would you also advocate opening up the borders to illegals from Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Somalia, etc.?
I would actually support amnesty for everyone already here– but only after we become serious about getting control of our border and complete the wall. No sense discussing about what to do with the water in the tub until the spigot is turned off.
One thing we need to do is to heavily tax those envio-dinero-a-Mexico places. Send a wire transfer to a foreign country, pay a 19% tax. Dedicate a small portion of the proceeds to setting up free ESL classes. Dedicate much of the revenues to defraying the burden illegal immigrants place on targeted social services.
SB - Are you so sure it’s a “mexican” thing? I tend to think it’s a price-point issue.
I have friends who purchased in Wylie less than five years ago (new construction), and their neighborhoods are already $hitholes. Less educated people tent to make less money and move into more affordable communities. Less educated people tend to have a higher tolerance for everything from teen pregnancy to couches in their front yards (and crime).
I’m pretty sure other low income people would have moved into those neighborhoods if hispanics had not.
SB, your hometown turned into a sh*thole and then the immigrants came for the affordable, poorly aged (sh*thole) housing stock.
Unless, of course, an army of dishwashers bought up block after block of $400k homes and systematically degraded them.
Here’s an interesting factoid: illegal immigrants prop up Social Security to the tune of $13 billion per annum.
Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories.....8207.shtml
Huh? beat me to it, sorry.
I couldn’t agree more Sky. But, I would also be for opening the borders if everyone would pay taxes. This country used to have a very “open door” to immigrants. We turned very few people away.
My whole point is we need a solution to the problem that will give me as many rights as an illegal immigrant. Right now, I have to show ID to rent or buy a home. Illegal immigrants don’t. I have to pay taxes to the federal government to the tune of 20%-30%, illegal immigrants don’t. I pay property tax to a school district that is setting up ESL classes for children of illegal immigrants WHO DON”T PAY PROPERTY OR FEDERAL TAXES.
I don’t have a problem with paying everything I do, I just don’t feel illegal immigrants making 30% less than me annually should get breaks just because we don’t want to hurt their effing feelings.
At the end of the day, we should do what is in the best interest of the United States, not necessarily what is in the best interest of the illegal immigrants. If we truly need more laborers then we should set up a guest worker program to accommodate that need. If we should control our borders to better monitor who comes and goes, then that should be a priority as well.
There may be racism on both sides, but the main arguments have absolutely nothing to do with race.
So we don’t want “those people” coming in to earn money and spending it? Would we have a remodeled Wal-Mart in Garland and a new grocery store in what was previously a closed, vacated Albertsons store at Marsh and Walnut Hill?
The jobs and sales tax revenue created by the new stores are positive. If you don’t like growth and expansion of the local population and economy (whether it be by primarily English or Spanish-speaking residents), there’s plenty of room in Detroit or the rural Midwest, where populations are shrinking, unemployment is rising, tax bases are evaporating and property values are tanking.
I think that’s what Wick’s post was saying in the first place.
How are we going to replace the $13 billion annual contribution to Social Security made by these illegal immigrants? As an aside, unlike legal residents, it doesn’t appear that these folks have any entitlement to benefits, so this is basically an outright subsidy by the illegal immigrants to legal residents.
Wylie - Are you saying the majority of illegal immigrants are paid by normal check with standard deductions? That the maids, construction workers, landscapers and whatnot paid by cash on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis? Because that would be the only way they are paying for their medicaid and welfare.
AND, are you saying the cost to set up ESL in all local school districts are paid for by anyone other than the legal home owners?
I would love to review your research. Can you provide me with a link or something?
You are aware that illegal immigrants are basically this century’s slave labor, right? And yet, anyone who argues against it is a racist? Makes a lot of sense to me.
Renters — legal or illegal — pay property taxes as part of their rent, whether said rent is paid for by cash, money order, or personal check.
For those who cling to “illegality” as the keystone issue, keep in mind that “legality” and “illegality” are abstract categories of status only, and as such are subject to change. (If you have brown eyes, you have brown eyes no matter what anyone says. But if you have, say, a license to practice law, you only have such status because enough of the rest of agree that you do.) I’m not saying the distinction between “legality” and “illegality” isn’t a concept to which we must all adhere (at least theoretically), in order for society to function smoothly–what I’m saying is that laws can be changed, and are, in fact, constantly being changed. Slavery used to be legal. So pose yourselves this hypothetical: if, for whatever reason, the federal government were to suddenly grant citizenship to all currently illegal aliens as of tomorrow, suddenly making their status fully legal, would your objections to those people just as suddenly evaporate into thin air? If you can honestly answer “yes,” not in this comment column, but in your heart of hearts, then so be it. But I and many others doubt it very sincerely.
Tom - I stand corrected. The property taxes are being paid, so I should have thought that one through.
To that same point, don’t we have homeowners and renters rights? The whole reason the “slum lord” precautions were put in place? If someone is not legally here, and we don’t know they are here, and we don’t know they are renting, how can we protect those rights?
Good question Adam. If it is in reference to me, I don’t object to “people.” I object to crime.
I fully believe illegal immigrants are guilty of tax evasion. Would you or I not be prosecuted if we continuously refused to pay federal tax?
So, if illegal immigrants were put into the federal tax base and started paying taxes on their next check, I would fully support them and their right to live and work in this country.
Huh? - http://www.reason.org/commenta.....0501.shtml
Try that link for some stats on taxes paid by illegal immigrants, most studies show that the majority do pay income taxes. In addition they certainly pay property taxes as a portion of their rent, and sales tax for ever item they buy.
Wick, you are so wrong. The folks you deride are upset over ILLEGAL immigration. Like so many liberals you tend to leave off a word like that to paint your opponents on this issue with a broad brush. I am not opposed to immigrants or immigration. I am opposed to illegal immigrants and illegal immigration. I have no problem with a legal immigrant getting a job in this country. I have an enormous problem with an illegal immigrant getting a job in this country.
Are we clear? Do you get it? Seriously? Do you?
1. You totally sounded like my tenth grade gym teacher, after he caught us cheating at bowling.
2. Wick’s a liberal?
Huh? - Who is this “we” that knows people are renting and is protecting those rights? When I rented an apartment in the past I do not recall registering with any entity charged with protecting “renters rights.”
I never questioned the sales tax, and I am a little amazed to read two-thirds pay federal income tax. But I do question the story from the link.
Illegal immigrants account for 10% of the social security surplus? Really?
And the author inferred the government is milking the illegal immigrants as they don’t collect social security because of fake identities. Really? The cost of free emergency care for all 12 million doesn’t outweigh the supposed taxes being paid by eight million? And are they all licensed drivers? Insured motorists? Etc?
I know people who hire maids. They don’t pay by check. I know people who have discounted landscapers. They don’t pay by check. I also have never rented or purchased a home without being required to give a copy of my driver’s license and social security number.
The day every person has to do the same is the day I feel better. And I don’t give a d@mn if they are poor people from Mexico or rich people from England.
Hasn’t something gone fundamentally wrong this the politically correct game when liberals argue for the continued exploitation of a minority race of people in the name of equal rights?
“….wrong with the….”
Is this the Cherry Pit thread?
Huh? - So you consider giving the landlord a copy of your driver’s license and social security as a way of making sure “we” know you are here and can protect your “renters rights”?
I would guess the landlord wanted to use that information to check your credit, not to pass it along to “we” so that “we” could protect you from the landlord.
Unemployment rates, immigration… those arguments are the Red Herring to the real problems in our culture… namely, education and the rapidly growing chasm between the rich and poor.
Exactly, DM. And I don’t see how continuing to import an undereducated workforce who are allowed to fly under the radar (to their own detriment as much as ours) and who will work for pennies on the dollar is going to help solve those problems anytime soon.
Unemployment in Texas would be even lower if we adopted the same immigration reform laws that Oklahoma passed(HB 1804). The pro-immigration activists cried that this would cause the Oklahoma economy to grind to a halt. That Oklahoma “needed” illegals. That never materialized. The result of the law is that Oklahoma unemployment has dropped to 3.1 % in March 2008, down from 4.0% in March 2007.
Hamburgers in Oklahoma now don’t cost $18, the lawns still get mowed, the pools still get cleaned.
Fact is, getting rid of illegal aliens put Americans back to work.
Oklahoma is “OK” with me!
*fights knee-jerk, first grader response*
So you’re saying because of that bill, and that bill alone, unemployment dropped in Oklahoma?
He’s not saying that the bill explains the drop in unemployment. It just dispels the myth from the pro-immigration alarmists that unemployment would be rampant if we cracked down on illegal immigrants. The biggest lie being told in America is that “immigrants do jobs that Americans don’t want or refuse to do.” The numbers in Oklahoma seems to provide evidence that that isn’t the case.
“The result of the law is that Oklahoma unemployment has dropped to 3.1 % in March 2008, down from 4.0% in March 2007.”
That is what he said.
However, if you actually look at those state reports, those decreases in unemployment rates are attributed to employers adding NEW jobs. In Oklahoma, there were jobs added in every sector except manufacturing.
http://www.normantranscript.co....._113112914
I’m not saying that its not a myth, or that it is. I’m just saying that I’m certain the drop in the unemployment rate in Oklahoma has as much weight in this debate.
For one thing, are you sure illegal immigrants are really going to be the ones claiming unemployment benefits - with that whole pesky “might get picked up by ICE” thing?
That’s how unemployment is measured on those reports, by and large - claims for unemployment benefits.
How did “we” work it when “we” let practically the whole State of Florida arrive from Cuba? And still coming. And don’t forget they were some of the peeps in the Cuban jails and criminals. Remember? The Cuban Mafia? Did they get a free pass, did they all become good citizens, are they all paying taxes and speaking English? They are here because their country is effed up and so is Mexico. Are “we” too PC to try to make those countries make things better so their peeps want to stay in their countries of birth, you know they all want to be in their homeland. Not the Land of Plenty where everyone picks on them. Right?
So Oklahoma has added almost 16,000 jobs this year, while at the same time eliminating what pro-immigration folks call an essential part of our workforce, and unemployment still went down? So, who exactly are filling all of these brand new jobs? Could it be hard-working Americans? Wow, that’s a novel concept.
Listen to this: (www.npr.org/templates/player/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=90216206&m=90216202) from NPR about the growth in the US population in the next few years. For several years most of the Hispanic growth in Texas has been from children born in the US, not brought to the US. As such, these children are legal citizens with full rights to stay, and at a future date, vote. The students who marched out of school a couple of years ago didn’t leave because they were being denied rights, but because the discussion was to make their illegally immigrated parents FELONS. I think we’re missing the real cultural change.
SB - nice try with the “enslavement” argument, but it’s so disingenuous considering the truly pitiful lives these people would lead in their home countries. Nice try to be a nice guy, though.
Hey! there’s a red nav bar at the bottom of the page! who knew?!
Bethany,
I think you need to educate yourself more on the HB 1804 issue. Oklahoma got tough with it’s illegal alien problems, most of them left, the economy did not skip a beat.
Usually by this point in the discussion, someone will make a jack-boot-thug reference to ICE or law enforcement. Fact is, illegal alien arrests have gone down 50% since the law took effect. They left and also took other problems that follow them around with them. Crystal meth arrests dropped 75%(since the suppliers from Mexico left), uninsured motorist accidents have dropped 60%, burglaries dropped 25%. The stats go on and on.
The pro-immigration folks hold our ability to enforce federal law by creating a myth around the lie that the illegal alien is the backbone of our economy. That is false. Pro-immigration folks hold our economy hostage with a gun to it’s head. What we are too dumb to realize is that the gun is unloaded. Click-click-click.
Somehow I have the feeling that lots of those who are opposed to immigration that is “illegal” just because it is the law, are inclined to drive 70 to 90 mph down the Tollway and Central. The speed limit is the law and to drive over it is “illegal”. We all pick and chose what laws we obey. Society operates best when the majority agree on what laws to obey. The public’s disregarding of some laws can result in changes, such as the repeal of prohibition. Laws can be changed to reflect what is best for society.
I wish I had grown up hanging with Wick. Together we would have tossed cherry bombs into neighbors’ ponds and then shot our ‘B B’ guns at the goldfish that shot into the air.
As I post these…46 posts on this three line thread? I mean…Trey could not get that with a one liner like “taking a gun into a church is a God given right and I will shoot any priest, preacher or rabbi who tries to stop me”. Or Time with “I used to Southlake. Now I hate Coppell”. What about Zac posting “The reason Schutze blow smoke out his ass is because that’s where I crush out my butts”.
Let’s stir up this joint with incite-full media button pushers!
“SB - nice try with the “enslavement” argument, but it’s so disingenuous considering the truly pitiful lives these people would lead in their home countries. Nice try to be a nice guy, though.”
Seriously, that’s your argument. You’re one notch away saying the original slaves actually had it better on American plantations because their lives in the African wild were so harsh.
We’re a country that loves to protest child labor and foreign sweat shops, while at the same time standing up for the right to pay someone $3 an hour to work 80 hour weeks in grueling physical conditions. I just think if you’re gonna argue on a platform of human rights, then you should go all the way. You think these people deserve to be here, but you don’t give a $hit whether or not they are paid or treated fairly.
It must be hard to walk that tightrope nonstop.
I wish I had grown up hanging with Wick. Together we would have tossed cherry bombs into neighbors’ ponds and then shot our ‘B B’ guns at the goldfish that shot into the air.
As I post this there are already what…46 posts on this three line thread? I mean…Trey could not get that with a one liner like “taking a gun into a church is a God given right and I will shoot any priest, preacher or rabbi who tries to stop me”.
Or Tim with “I used to Southlake. Now I hate Coppell”.
What about Zac posting “The reason Schutze blows smoke out his ass is because that’s where I crush out my butts”.
Let’s stir up this joint with incite-full media button pushers!
Um… I wasn’t a math major - and only dabbled in econ, but anytime you have more jobs than you have available, qualified workforce, you will have a lowered unemployment rate.
So it stands to reason that a combination of new jobs and new legislation reducing the available workforce pool would indeed result in a lower UNemployment rate, for there would be more jobs floating out there, available.
The unknown is how many of the jobs that were made available to hard-working Americans that may have previously been under the purvey of an illegal immigrant were actually filled. With an unemployment rate that low, it could be that the new jobs were filled by “hard-working Americans,” and the majority of these other jobs are still out there, unfilled.
Those unemployment numbers really don’t tell you one way or another.
So I really don’t think the myth can be proclaimed once and for all “busted” based on numbers from Oklahoma.
After all, there’s still this:
http://www.nbcaugusta.com/news/local/18686819.html
http://www.thedailyjournal.com.....50323/1002
I didn’t say anything about the legislation, Bill. I said that it wasn’t entirely what pushed Oklahoma’s lower unemployment rate.
no, sb, the biggest lie is blonde hair, blue eyed Jesus. that one still causes pause.
someone please give me voltaire’s quote on opinions.
Legalize and regulate recreational drugs in this country, watch as the Mexican drug cartels die, and then see the American investment capital flow into legitimate economic enterprises in Mexico.
Balk at that first part? Then expect more of the same and learn to love it.
SB, I think — well, I’m pretty sure — something died under my house. It’s near the center of the house and I’m too much of a weenie to crawl under there, let alone drag out the bloated, maybe-about-to-explode carcass of who-knows-what. I’d be glad to pay you, or anyone you might know who’s desperate for work, the legitimate American minimum wage to do this disgusting and somewhat dangerous job. I promise to file a W-whatever-it-is come next April. Pickupthephonegiveusacall.
So Oklahoma passed a law, and all of the illegal immigrants left? Really? Hmmm. Right.
You know, the US passed laws against drugs and prostitution too…that sure took care of that problem.
Lee -
“We all pick and chose what laws we obey.”
Yes, we do. And, I am willing to use the legal system to get out of/pay the ticket when the time comes. Your argument would only make sense if you then decided not to give me a ticket because you didn’t want to offend me.
GMOM -
I’m not opposed to immigration. I am opposed to both sides saying there is a problem and yet nobody is strong enough to come up with a plan (without offending). Skrew offending somebody, lets just put a plan in place so we can put some closure on the undocumented humans living/working in our country.
Grant -
You may have solved Farmer’s Branches problem. Pass a law requiring a “credit” check for all renters. Then we wouldn’t REALLY be looking for an ID to make sure the renter is a legal citizen, we would merely be checking their payment history. Really. Why wouldn’t that work?
All -
I had lunch today at a local sandwich shop. The person who prepared my meal was not illegal. As a matter of fact, he wasn’t hispanic. But, after that experience, maybe DriveBy was right…..the unemployment rate is too low. As a matter of fact, maybe an illegal immigrant would have understood when I said “no lettuce, add peppers.” BTW - I got extra lettuce and no peppers.
huh, you mean these aliens do GOOD wotk, too? stop it!
I wonder what that ancient great sandal wearin’ liberal woulda said? Oh wait, I think I know…
Leviticus (19:33-4):”And if a stranger sojourn with thee in your land, ye shall not vex him. But the stranger that dwelleth with you shall be unto you as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself.”
(Ex. 22:21); “Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt”
(Ex. 23:9); “Do not oppress an alien: you yourselves know how it feels to be aliens”
Then there’s that pesky Matthew 25:31–46 that says to mistreat the “stranger” is to mistreat Christ
I guess you’ve always got Romans 13:1-7 which states to obey the laws of the government….EXCEPT for that pesky Acts 5:29, which makes an exception for laws that obstruct God’s will. In this case, I suggest re-reading the first three.
Amen.
Information related to the substantial taxes paid by illegal immigrants has already been posted.
Here is a link to one of numerous research studies which suggest that incarceration rates for foreign-born individuals residing in the U.S. (both legal and illegal) are FAR greater than incarceration rates for native-born Americans:
http://borderbattles.ssrc.org/.....ndex1.html
and yes, I realize Lev., and Ex. are Old Testament. But Matthew is anything but…
Jason,
Galatians 1:9 “As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let him be eternally condemned!”
Pretty much cuttin’ and pastin’ the old saw scriptures that liberals dig up to throw in the face of those who favor tougher immigration enforcement is EXACTLY what Galatians is talking about.
The truth of the matter is this:
Unemployment rates are all contrived BULLCRAP. LIES. LIES, and more LIES.
If you find yourself unemployed, and are not able to find a job in six months…then you become PERMANENTLY retired according to the Government folks that keep records of such things.
The hubby is trying to get Social Security disability, and the government does nothing but throw up road blocks…and they are doing the same thing with folks trying to get unemployment help.
I love my country….but I truly hate my government, and what it has become….but I don’t blame the illegals.
I instead blame the tax benefits that allowed companies to move highly trained jobs offshore. I blame the State…which sure doesn’t mind hiring illegals when it suits their purposes…..such as road construction, and maintenance.
And I blame the current administration, who funded a phony war so Halliburton, and other businesses that Cheney and Bush Jr and Sr were involved with….which just funneled more and more tax money away from the people and into the pockets of corporate bloodsuckers.
Do I sound bitter? Hell yes I am bitter! Bitter, and under employed.
Oh yeah, Bill…right. I buy it…but do you think God will?
Justify your hate all you want, but something tells me the guy you worship lived his life to fight oppressing the poor and oppressed.
Something tells me you’re gonna have A LOT of explaning to do when in line at those golden gates. Be sure to quote Galatians on your way down.
Just a couple of thoughts on “Oh My Eyes.”
First, I wish you and your hubby all the best. Being unemployed or disabled has to be tough and I hope things get much better for you.
With that said……if a person is unemployed for more than six months, they might want to start setting the bar a little lower. I have been unemployed for months at a time, but there is a point when I have to take a job to take care of my family. I wouldn’t want to flip burgers or wait tables, but if it’s that’s only thing I could find………..
Hey Jason, you should let Bill and the Big Guy discuss his interpretation of the Bible when he gets there. It gives the whole forum tired head.
Huh:
We don’t live in Dallas anymore…we could not afford it.
Setting the bar too high?
Would you expect a Dr’s assistant to work at Braum’s, and maintain a household with that kind of money?
Would you ask a highly trained technician who made $20 an hour to live on wages from WalMart?
And what about all those computer programmers, and analysts who are highly trained in specific fields? They can’t just go get another job without taking a horrific pay cut.
The hubby was a highly trained specialist in a small town, where there is just one company that does his line of work. Even if he COULD work (although the steel rods in his back make lifting, bending, stooping, and standing for long is now impossible), what could he do in the podunk town we now live in?
And moving is out of the question, as we now live on family owned land…for which we pay no rent.
It is really easy to point the finger at Illegal aliens…but in the screwed up work situation in this country illegals are not the main issue: Corporate greed is.
For the record, I have not blamed any work situation on illegal immigrants. I don’t have a problem with people working in this county, just working and not paying taxes.
As for your situation, I do wish you the best. I was being sincere. If your husband can’t work because of a disability, then he can’t work. I know it takes months and months and many doctor reviews before it gets approved, I hope you are almost through that process.
Wait a minute, I just had my own personal Wachovia Road to Damascus Moment*. Now I understand deep in my heart: God on High is deeply aggrieved by Spanish-language storefronts!
He truly does see every sparrow that falls.
* Who says corporate naming rights have gone too far? God doesn’t think so — and now that I’m Born Again (TM), I consider myself qualified to speak for him.
Jason: “Something tells me you’re gonna have A LOT of explaning to do when in line at those golden gates. Be sure to quote Galatians on your way down.”
Unless God’s redirected the gatway to heaven through San Francisco, I believe it’s the pearly gates I hope to pass through, not the golden gates.
Double doggone darn. I love it.
You see I do real work. Girls can’t do the kind of work I do. In fact the only people I can find that can do the kind of work that I do is usually an immigrant from south of the border and more often than not they’re here illegally.
The reason most of the Americans can’t do the kind of work that I do is because they were raised by their mothers. There’s something lost when daddy isn’t around for a boy growing up.
The first thing the men from south of the border bring to the table, work table, is they respect the work. Stop and think real hard for a minute, concentrate, now tell me when was the last time you met an American who respected the work?
One of the benefits of respecting the work is inherently there is a respect for those who have been doing the work the longest, elders if you will.
Just last week I had some masons on a job I’m doing. I knew something was up when the radio started blasting out hip hop instead of mariachi married to country rock.
The father gave me the same stuff all the mexicanos give me when they find out I work by myself. He called me greedy.
It took me awhile, not the sharpest knife in the toolbox all the time, but I finally figured out why the mexicanos saw me as greedy.
You see norte americanos see someone with a good job and they want a pay check. They want you to give them money.
The hispanicos see it differently. If you have work you have a responsiblity to share it. You have a responsiblity to share the opportunity to work.
There’s a big difference between sharing opportunity to work and sharing money, completely different concepts.
It didn’t take me long to put together the older man sitting in the truck smoking his cigarette between catnaps was the father. The young man with the hip hop irritating the bejezzuz out of me was his son.
There’s something about a soldier. It might be the measuring look they return when you shake their hand. Heck, it might be the chip on the shoulder. But there’s something about a soldier. I picked it up when I explained to the masons the way I wanted them to do what I wanted them to do. The son has just finished his military commitment and he’s working with his dad until college starts this fall.
I’d bet the pants against the underwear that the father was once an illegal. And the son got his work ethic from his father. That’s because girls can’t do the work I do. Neither can the boys they raise on their own.
http://www.tractorbynet.com/fo.....er-35.html
Oh My Eyes,
You could afford to live in Dallas very easily. You just don’t want to live where all the brown and black people are.
Racist.