Joel Kotkin says it’s because we’re not hip. Like Charlotte, Raleigh, and Houston, Dallas is family-friendly, and that’s what young, educated married couples want.
5 Comments to “Why Is Dallas Growing?”
Jason@ November 27th, 2007 at 4:20 pm
It looks like Jim at the DO beat you to the punch on this link:
I bet Avi would not agree with this as he apparently lives in the only “hip” area left in this town what with all the “scumbars full of piss” and whatnot.
J@ November 27th, 2007 at 6:29 pm
I thought it was because of cheap housing. Who knew that Dallas, with the highest crime rate in the country and pathetic public schools, was “family friendly”?
Daniel@ November 28th, 2007 at 9:32 am
It’s less than clear from the article whether the author means Dallas or the Dallas area. Dallas itself is no more family friendly than L.A. — you can make it work if you’re a determined urbanite, but there’ll be no shielding the kids from the ugly side of life unless you’re flat-out richer than Jesus.
The area, however, is stocked bow-to-stern with tidy, affordable bedroom communities, as well as exemplary upscale ones. (Might I suggest we gratuitously excoriate Southlake-ites? That was fun, on account of it made them hoppin’ mad. Let’s pile on, people!)
J@ November 28th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
The article puts an asterisk next to the growth of the Portland area, because most of that growth is in the suburbs. If he has Dallas suburbs in mind (as the family friendly part), it doesn’t make sense to carve out the suburbs of cities that don’t fit his hypothesis.
It looks like Jim at the DO beat you to the punch on this link:
http://blogs.dallasobserver.co.....wntown.php
I bet Avi would not agree with this as he apparently lives in the only “hip” area left in this town what with all the “scumbars full of piss” and whatnot.
I thought it was because of cheap housing. Who knew that Dallas, with the highest crime rate in the country and pathetic public schools, was “family friendly”?
It’s less than clear from the article whether the author means Dallas or the Dallas area. Dallas itself is no more family friendly than L.A. — you can make it work if you’re a determined urbanite, but there’ll be no shielding the kids from the ugly side of life unless you’re flat-out richer than Jesus.
The area, however, is stocked bow-to-stern with tidy, affordable bedroom communities, as well as exemplary upscale ones. (Might I suggest we gratuitously excoriate Southlake-ites? That was fun, on account of it made them hoppin’ mad. Let’s pile on, people!)
The article puts an asterisk next to the growth of the Portland area, because most of that growth is in the suburbs. If he has Dallas suburbs in mind (as the family friendly part), it doesn’t make sense to carve out the suburbs of cities that don’t fit his hypothesis.